Re: [tram] Two new authentication mechanisms
"Wilson Chen (weichen2)" <weichen2@cisco.com> Thu, 10 July 2014 06:40 UTC
Return-Path: <weichen2@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D5E1B27A2 for <tram@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 23:40:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.152
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.152 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9Ou9GLHU8-Qs for <tram@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 23:40:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1A481B279E for <tram@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 23:40:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6484; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1404974432; x=1406184032; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=A4dAOh4QL5nKokB6JoSaocz3VSrlqBZJQskxTghKCTM=; b=Z8piXb26xWNhgj31SuAC9Im+6pi+sQDK2tioqd9dfLytuPsZwMek8pJ3 B6ItNE7X3vpXEsi6GRC34XIwQ2O+HQFOz4rzryv/OFRdzomNIipdVI0Fm iD3Uk+kucS7NtB2zxKGJlewUdhvdNyPr/wXRYu8hPP/WmOpO/+VvEvzJk 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhwFACQ0vlOtJA2F/2dsb2JhbABZgw5SWoJvvC0Ih0EBGW0WdYQDAQEBBAEBASAROhcEAgEGAhEDAQEBAQICBh0DAgICHwYLFAEICAIEEwiIJgMRDZIOnCeSGg2HAxeBLItsgXk4BoJxNoEWBZh4g0iMMoYUg0NsgUQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,636,1400025600"; d="scan'208";a="338987635"
Received: from alln-core-11.cisco.com ([173.36.13.133]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 10 Jul 2014 06:40:29 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com [173.37.183.82]) by alln-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s6A6eTw7021348 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <tram@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Jul 2014 06:40:29 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x15.cisco.com ([169.254.9.9]) by xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com ([173.37.183.82]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Thu, 10 Jul 2014 01:40:28 -0500
From: "Wilson Chen (weichen2)" <weichen2@cisco.com>
To: "tram@ietf.org" <tram@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [tram] Two new authentication mechanisms
Thread-Index: Ac+UjCJkXJjKDPQUa0ChRCj0QZ8T9wAMWDuAAABnRAAAG1dgAAE00TcAAAwjC4AABj5MgABwHRug
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 06:40:28 +0000
Message-ID: <3A5DAAA1FDD9764EAA3B2A633A91A04967458581@xmb-aln-x15.cisco.com>
References: <CFE04FAE.ABCEA%ancaz@cisco.com> <F8ACC39A-4314-4A2C-9B47-570C87DB425D@gmail.com> <A89F522E-C2F0-4458-AA9A-42EDF1C771C2@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <A89F522E-C2F0-4458-AA9A-42EDF1C771C2@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.140.50.201]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tram/P-OiQtPR7AsglvM1M_S4Dh9p78E
Subject: Re: [tram] Two new authentication mechanisms
X-BeenThere: tram@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussing the creation of a Turn Revised And Modernized \(TRAM\) WG, which goal is to consolidate the various initiatives to update TURN and STUN." <tram.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tram/>
List-Post: <mailto:tram@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 06:40:33 -0000
+1 Supporting adoption of two separate drafts. Regards, Wilson Chen > -----Original Message----- > From: tram [mailto:tram-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Pal Martinsen > (palmarti) > Sent: 2014年7月8日 4:10 > To: tram@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [tram] Two new authentication mechanisms > > +1 > > Supporting adoption of two separate drafts. > (And if time permits I will try to implement it on the client side.) > > .-. > Pål-Erik > > On 07 Jul 2014, at 19:10, Oleg Moskalenko <mom040267@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > I support the adoption of separate drafts. > > > > Oleg > > > >> On Jul 7, 2014, at 4:23 AM, "Anca Zamfir (ancaz)" <ancaz@cisco.com> wrote: > >> > >> +1 > >> Support adoption as separate documents. > >> -anca > >> > >>> On 7/1/14 10:00 AM, "Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)" <rmohanr@cisco.com> > wrote: > >>> > >>> +1 > >>> > >>> Support adoption of both the documents and should be left as seperate. > >>> > >>> Ram > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: "Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com> > >>> Date: Tuesday, 1 July 2014 12:28 am > >>> To: Simon Perreault <simon@per.reau.lt> > >>> Cc: "tram@ietf.org" <tram@ietf.org> > >>> Subject: Re: [tram] Two new authentication mechanisms > >>> > >>>> +1 > >>>> > >>>> Support adoption of both docs and they should be left as separate. > >>>> > >>>> Cheers, > >>>> > >>>> Gonzalo > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Jun 30, 2014, at 2:46 PM, Alan Johnston > >>>> <alan.b.johnston@gmail.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Agree with Tiru on both points. > >>>>> > >>>>> - Alan - > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy) > >>>>> <tireddy@cisco.com> wrote: > >>>>> I support adoption of both drafts. I think there is no interaction > >>>>> required between these two drafts. For example If third party > >>>>> authorization is used then ORIGIN attribute could be used by the > >>>>> TURN server for logging purpose. > >>>>> > >>>>> -Tiru > >>>>> > >>>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>>> From: tram [mailto:tram-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Simon > >>>>> Perreault > >>>>>> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 6:51 PM > >>>>>> To: tram@ietf.org > >>>>>> Subject: [tram] Two new authentication mechanisms > >>>>>> > >>>>>> TRAMsters, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> We are soliciting discussion on the potential adoption as > >>>>> working-group > >>>>>> documents of these two drafts: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-johnston-tram-stun-origin > >>>>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-reddy-tram-turn-third-party-auth > >>>>>> z > >>>>>> > >>>>>> They would be targeted at fulfilling milestone 4 ("Nov 2014 - > >>>>>> Send > >>>>> new > >>>>>> authentication mechanism(s) to IESG for publication as Proposed > >>>>> Standard"). > >>>>>> > >>>>>> If you would like to see one or both of the drafts adopted, or if > >>>>>> you > >>>>> are opposed, > >>>>>> please explain why. Authors, we will assume you are for adoption > >>>>>> of > >>>>> your own > >>>>>> drafts. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Please consider the interactions between the two drafts. Is there > >>>>> anything > >>>>>> interesting or problematic? What about overlap in function? Is > >>>>>> there > >>>>> any? If so, > >>>>>> is it necessary or problematic? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Let's take two weeks to discuss this. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>> Simon & Gonzalo > >>>>>> > >>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>> tram mailing list > >>>>>> tram@ietf.org > >>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram > >>>>> > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> tram mailing list > >>>>> tram@ietf.org > >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram > >>>>> > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> tram mailing list > >>>>> tram@ietf.org > >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> tram mailing list > >>>> tram@ietf.org > >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> tram mailing list > >>> tram@ietf.org > >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> tram mailing list > >> tram@ietf.org > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram > > > > _______________________________________________ > > tram mailing list > > tram@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram > > _______________________________________________ > tram mailing list > tram@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram
- [tram] Two new authentication mechanisms Simon Perreault
- Re: [tram] Two new authentication mechanisms Yoakum, John H (John)
- Re: [tram] Two new authentication mechanisms Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)
- Re: [tram] Two new authentication mechanisms Alan Johnston
- Re: [tram] Two new authentication mechanisms Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)
- Re: [tram] Two new authentication mechanisms Oleg Moskalenko
- Re: [tram] Two new authentication mechanisms Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)
- Re: [tram] Two new authentication mechanisms Oleg Moskalenko
- Re: [tram] Two new authentication mechanisms Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)
- Re: [tram] Two new authentication mechanisms Anca Zamfir (ancaz)
- Re: [tram] Two new authentication mechanisms Oleg Moskalenko
- Re: [tram] Two new authentication mechanisms Pal Martinsen (palmarti)
- Re: [tram] Two new authentication mechanisms Muthu Arul
- Re: [tram] Two new authentication mechanisms Wilson Chen (weichen2)
- Re: [tram] Two new authentication mechanisms Simon Perreault
- Re: [tram] Two new authentication mechanisms Brandon Williams