Re: [tram] Two new authentication mechanisms

"Wilson Chen (weichen2)" <weichen2@cisco.com> Thu, 10 July 2014 06:40 UTC

Return-Path: <weichen2@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D5E1B27A2 for <tram@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 23:40:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.152
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.152 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9Ou9GLHU8-Qs for <tram@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 23:40:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1A481B279E for <tram@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 23:40:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6484; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1404974432; x=1406184032; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=A4dAOh4QL5nKokB6JoSaocz3VSrlqBZJQskxTghKCTM=; b=Z8piXb26xWNhgj31SuAC9Im+6pi+sQDK2tioqd9dfLytuPsZwMek8pJ3 B6ItNE7X3vpXEsi6GRC34XIwQ2O+HQFOz4rzryv/OFRdzomNIipdVI0Fm iD3Uk+kucS7NtB2zxKGJlewUdhvdNyPr/wXRYu8hPP/WmOpO/+VvEvzJk 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhwFACQ0vlOtJA2F/2dsb2JhbABZgw5SWoJvvC0Ih0EBGW0WdYQDAQEBBAEBASAROhcEAgEGAhEDAQEBAQICBh0DAgICHwYLFAEICAIEEwiIJgMRDZIOnCeSGg2HAxeBLItsgXk4BoJxNoEWBZh4g0iMMoYUg0NsgUQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,636,1400025600"; d="scan'208";a="338987635"
Received: from alln-core-11.cisco.com ([173.36.13.133]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 10 Jul 2014 06:40:29 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com [173.37.183.82]) by alln-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s6A6eTw7021348 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <tram@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Jul 2014 06:40:29 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x15.cisco.com ([169.254.9.9]) by xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com ([173.37.183.82]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Thu, 10 Jul 2014 01:40:28 -0500
From: "Wilson Chen (weichen2)" <weichen2@cisco.com>
To: "tram@ietf.org" <tram@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [tram] Two new authentication mechanisms
Thread-Index: Ac+UjCJkXJjKDPQUa0ChRCj0QZ8T9wAMWDuAAABnRAAAG1dgAAE00TcAAAwjC4AABj5MgABwHRug
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 06:40:28 +0000
Message-ID: <3A5DAAA1FDD9764EAA3B2A633A91A04967458581@xmb-aln-x15.cisco.com>
References: <CFE04FAE.ABCEA%ancaz@cisco.com> <F8ACC39A-4314-4A2C-9B47-570C87DB425D@gmail.com> <A89F522E-C2F0-4458-AA9A-42EDF1C771C2@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <A89F522E-C2F0-4458-AA9A-42EDF1C771C2@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.140.50.201]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tram/P-OiQtPR7AsglvM1M_S4Dh9p78E
Subject: Re: [tram] Two new authentication mechanisms
X-BeenThere: tram@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussing the creation of a Turn Revised And Modernized \(TRAM\) WG, which goal is to consolidate the various initiatives to update TURN and STUN." <tram.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tram/>
List-Post: <mailto:tram@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 06:40:33 -0000

+1 Supporting adoption of two separate drafts.

Regards,
Wilson Chen

> -----Original Message-----
> From: tram [mailto:tram-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Pal Martinsen
> (palmarti)
> Sent: 2014年7月8日 4:10
> To: tram@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [tram] Two new authentication mechanisms
> 
> +1
> 
> Supporting adoption of two separate drafts.
> (And if time permits I will try to implement it on the client side.)
> 
> .-.
> Pål-Erik
> 
> On 07 Jul 2014, at 19:10, Oleg Moskalenko <mom040267@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > +1
> >
> > I support the adoption of separate drafts.
> >
> > Oleg
> >
> >> On Jul 7, 2014, at 4:23 AM, "Anca Zamfir (ancaz)" <ancaz@cisco.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> +1
> >> Support adoption as separate documents.
> >> -anca
> >>
> >>> On 7/1/14 10:00 AM, "Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)" <rmohanr@cisco.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>> Support adoption of both the documents and should be left as seperate.
> >>>
> >>> Ram
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: "Gonzalo Salgueiro   (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com>
> >>> Date: Tuesday, 1 July 2014 12:28 am
> >>> To: Simon Perreault <simon@per.reau.lt>
> >>> Cc: "tram@ietf.org" <tram@ietf.org>
> >>> Subject: Re: [tram] Two new authentication mechanisms
> >>>
> >>>> +1
> >>>>
> >>>> Support adoption of both docs and they should be left as separate.
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>>
> >>>> Gonzalo
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Jun 30, 2014, at 2:46 PM, Alan Johnston
> >>>> <alan.b.johnston@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Agree with Tiru on both points.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - Alan -
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)
> >>>>> <tireddy@cisco.com> wrote:
> >>>>> I support adoption of both drafts. I think there is no interaction
> >>>>> required between these two drafts. For example If third party
> >>>>> authorization is used then ORIGIN attribute could be used by the
> >>>>> TURN server for logging purpose.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -Tiru
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>>> From: tram [mailto:tram-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Simon
> >>>>> Perreault
> >>>>>> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 6:51 PM
> >>>>>> To: tram@ietf.org
> >>>>>> Subject: [tram] Two new authentication mechanisms
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> TRAMsters,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> We are soliciting discussion on the potential adoption as
> >>>>> working-group
> >>>>>> documents of these two drafts:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-johnston-tram-stun-origin
> >>>>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-reddy-tram-turn-third-party-auth
> >>>>>> z
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> They would be targeted at fulfilling milestone 4 ("Nov 2014 -
> >>>>>> Send
> >>>>> new
> >>>>>> authentication mechanism(s) to IESG for publication as Proposed
> >>>>> Standard").
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> If you would like to see one or both of the drafts adopted, or if
> >>>>>> you
> >>>>> are opposed,
> >>>>>> please explain why. Authors, we will assume you are for adoption
> >>>>>> of
> >>>>> your own
> >>>>>> drafts.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Please consider the interactions between the two drafts. Is there
> >>>>> anything
> >>>>>> interesting or problematic? What about overlap in function? Is
> >>>>>> there
> >>>>> any? If so,
> >>>>>> is it necessary or problematic?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Let's take two weeks to discuss this.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>> Simon & Gonzalo
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> tram mailing list
> >>>>>> tram@ietf.org
> >>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> tram mailing list
> >>>>> tram@ietf.org
> >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> tram mailing list
> >>>>> tram@ietf.org
> >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> tram mailing list
> >>>> tram@ietf.org
> >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> tram mailing list
> >>> tram@ietf.org
> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> tram mailing list
> >> tram@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > tram mailing list
> > tram@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tram mailing list
> tram@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram