IETF Logo Mail Archive

[tram] Two new authentication mechanisms

Simon Perreault <simon@per.reau.lt> Fri, 27 June 2014 13:21 UTC

Return-Path: <simon@per.reau.lt>
X-Original-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 494891B319C for <tram@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 06:21:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1ojDBvmWqb7t for <tram@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 06:21:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nomis80.org (nomis80.org [IPv6:2600:3c03::f03c:91ff:fe69:7108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 743881B319B for <tram@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 06:21:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.96] (modemcable233.42-178-173.mc.videotron.ca [173.178.42.233]) by nomis80.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3354810EAB for <tram@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 13:24:28 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <53AD6FD6.3080205@per.reau.lt>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 09:21:26 -0400
From: Simon Perreault <simon@per.reau.lt>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "tram@ietf.org" <tram@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tram/oXzGoBHs-n9qTV8Pb70kYL29Q2U
Subject: [tram] Two new authentication mechanisms
X-BeenThere: tram@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussing the creation of a Turn Revised And Modernized \(TRAM\) WG, which goal is to consolidate the various initiatives to update TURN and STUN." <tram.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tram/>
List-Post: <mailto:tram@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 13:21:29 -0000

TRAMsters,

We are soliciting discussion on the potential adoption as working-group 
documents of these two drafts:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-johnston-tram-stun-origin
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-reddy-tram-turn-third-party-authz

They would be targeted at fulfilling milestone 4 ("Nov 2014 - Send new 
authentication mechanism(s) to IESG for publication as Proposed Standard").

If you would like to see one or both of the drafts adopted, or if you 
are opposed, please explain why. Authors, we will assume you are for 
adoption of your own drafts.

Please consider the interactions between the two drafts. Is there 
anything interesting or problematic? What about overlap in function? Is 
there any? If so, is it necessary or problematic?

Let's take two weeks to discuss this.

Thanks,
Simon & Gonzalo

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email