IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tram] Two new authentication mechanisms

"Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)" <tireddy@cisco.com> Mon, 30 June 2014 17:53 UTC

Return-Path: <tireddy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E73D31A0400 for <tram@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 10:53:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.152
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.152 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y4XD6QViV6Yi for <tram@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 10:53:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 050ED1A03F8 for <tram@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 10:53:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1522; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1404150787; x=1405360387; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=sbThheFQs6GmOD3RF19dwC0QRCQvWDozCuMArKpIQnk=; b=UM0QP+5bBuhecdwni8Tw3k74m0thXQIb+PqLv/gWYrFecbX/b6VWlOyg HddFJnPgdF7g0ZS7WUJIjnPp6u72XnzfvC/GlO4WImNT5xirHG+CviQpv SKy0IXw4cTWmt01nyLDuJOkbjpqyk3wDbLAZgdBebz4rRqgyULMRMuOO1 Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aj8HACSjsVOtJV2c/2dsb2JhbABagw1SWqsaAQEBAQEBBQECbAGSBodAAYESFnWEAwEBAQQBAQE3NBcGAQgRBAEBCxQJLgsUCQkBBAESCIg6DcgoF4VkiHI+gyeBFgWcJJI3g0KCMA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,576,1400025600"; d="scan'208";a="57194572"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 30 Jun 2014 17:53:06 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x06.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x06.cisco.com [173.36.12.80]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s5UHr6aE031778 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 30 Jun 2014 17:53:06 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com ([169.254.15.102]) by xhc-aln-x06.cisco.com ([173.36.12.80]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 12:53:05 -0500
From: "Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)" <tireddy@cisco.com>
To: Simon Perreault <simon@per.reau.lt>, "tram@ietf.org" <tram@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [tram] Two new authentication mechanisms
Thread-Index: Ac+UjCJk7Vw1mgRQSQyCT9rqQ0aMTQ==
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 17:53:05 +0000
Message-ID: <913383AAA69FF945B8F946018B75898A282E8207@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.65.70.52]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tram/nMR4QOOoxiPATtKIfuAKV3eIKpo
Subject: Re: [tram] Two new authentication mechanisms
X-BeenThere: tram@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussing the creation of a Turn Revised And Modernized \(TRAM\) WG, which goal is to consolidate the various initiatives to update TURN and STUN." <tram.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tram/>
List-Post: <mailto:tram@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 17:53:09 -0000

I support adoption of both drafts. I think there is no interaction required between these two drafts. For example If third party authorization is used then ORIGIN attribute could be used by the TURN server for logging purpose.

-Tiru

> -----Original Message-----
> From: tram [mailto:tram-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Simon Perreault
> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 6:51 PM
> To: tram@ietf.org
> Subject: [tram] Two new authentication mechanisms
> 
> TRAMsters,
> 
> We are soliciting discussion on the potential adoption as working-group
> documents of these two drafts:
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-johnston-tram-stun-origin
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-reddy-tram-turn-third-party-authz
> 
> They would be targeted at fulfilling milestone 4 ("Nov 2014 - Send new
> authentication mechanism(s) to IESG for publication as Proposed Standard").
> 
> If you would like to see one or both of the drafts adopted, or if you are opposed,
> please explain why. Authors, we will assume you are for adoption of your own
> drafts.
> 
> Please consider the interactions between the two drafts. Is there anything
> interesting or problematic? What about overlap in function? Is there any? If so,
> is it necessary or problematic?
> 
> Let's take two weeks to discuss this.
> 
> Thanks,
> Simon & Gonzalo
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tram mailing list
> tram@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email