IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tram] Two new authentication mechanisms

"Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com> Mon, 30 June 2014 18:58 UTC

Return-Path: <gsalguei@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20CAF1A040F for <tram@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 11:58:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.152
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.152 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6SWYVhSOJUNv for <tram@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 11:58:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87BFC1A02E9 for <tram@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 11:58:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2202; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1404154683; x=1405364283; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=PFjzQ3QE4tTx6uYKDwD/ROBoptmkrGDe0TWe15xVLdg=; b=Phd56zJK1j2PPut5UwPKW2KsZ5WC8h2uADU1+dpqb/7NUzUdYcBPnUX9 /gBQyJI4OR2x4jlhu55b+nfrmUhRl2aU0bRAdA6Z3tFwYo/pISm0mPJ6I q3dwiNgQmc8K8KHDScLVPv5+ScXZ4hSJiX/LVObHH8rrrvmVejN6i+f33 E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjwHAB+ysVOtJA2J/2dsb2JhbABagw1SWqsaAQEBAQEBBQFuAZIGh0ABgRIWdYQDAQEBAwEBAQE3NAsFBwQCAQgRBAEBAR4JByEGCxQJCAEBBA4FiC4DCQgNwVINhlIXhWSGfIF0MwcGgyeBFgWYYIF+gUaMJYYSg0JsgUQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,576,1400025600"; d="scan'208";a="336740352"
Received: from alln-core-4.cisco.com ([173.36.13.137]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 30 Jun 2014 18:58:03 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com [173.37.183.84]) by alln-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s5UIw2fi011080 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 30 Jun 2014 18:58:02 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.176]) by xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com ([173.37.183.84]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 13:58:02 -0500
From: "Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com>
To: Simon Perreault <simon@per.reau.lt>
Thread-Topic: [tram] Two new authentication mechanisms
Thread-Index: Ac+UjCJk5vAAlzbsL0u8BKfRol6LCgAMWDuAAABnRAA=
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 18:58:02 +0000
Message-ID: <D4CD9D5E-B5BF-45C6-A827-C07ACCA349D7@cisco.com>
References: <913383AAA69FF945B8F946018B75898A282E8207@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com> <CAKhHsXHG5bVu4sNDQrYFnTFvyThiGa=trOoQUBi8bki5YU6USg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKhHsXHG5bVu4sNDQrYFnTFvyThiGa=trOoQUBi8bki5YU6USg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [64.102.154.234]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <E4AFB1311310F64FB8EB87680AEE908F@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tram/qpwKIGXuFAyk7h3gO4CWYVImcQ8
Cc: "tram@ietf.org" <tram@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tram] Two new authentication mechanisms
X-BeenThere: tram@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussing the creation of a Turn Revised And Modernized \(TRAM\) WG, which goal is to consolidate the various initiatives to update TURN and STUN." <tram.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tram/>
List-Post: <mailto:tram@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 18:58:05 -0000

+1

Support adoption of both docs and they should be left as separate.

Cheers,

Gonzalo


On Jun 30, 2014, at 2:46 PM, Alan Johnston <alan.b.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:

> Agree with Tiru on both points.
> 
> - Alan -
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy) <tireddy@cisco.com> wrote:
> I support adoption of both drafts. I think there is no interaction required between these two drafts. For example If third party authorization is used then ORIGIN attribute could be used by the TURN server for logging purpose.
> 
> -Tiru
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: tram [mailto:tram-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Simon Perreault
> > Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 6:51 PM
> > To: tram@ietf.org
> > Subject: [tram] Two new authentication mechanisms
> >
> > TRAMsters,
> >
> > We are soliciting discussion on the potential adoption as working-group
> > documents of these two drafts:
> >
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-johnston-tram-stun-origin
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-reddy-tram-turn-third-party-authz
> >
> > They would be targeted at fulfilling milestone 4 ("Nov 2014 - Send new
> > authentication mechanism(s) to IESG for publication as Proposed Standard").
> >
> > If you would like to see one or both of the drafts adopted, or if you are opposed,
> > please explain why. Authors, we will assume you are for adoption of your own
> > drafts.
> >
> > Please consider the interactions between the two drafts. Is there anything
> > interesting or problematic? What about overlap in function? Is there any? If so,
> > is it necessary or problematic?
> >
> > Let's take two weeks to discuss this.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Simon & Gonzalo
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > tram mailing list
> > tram@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tram mailing list
> tram@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tram mailing list
> tram@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email