Re: [tram] Two new authentication mechanisms

Support adoption of both as separate drafts.

Muthu

On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Wilson Chen (weichen2) <weichen2@cisco.com
> wrote:

> +1 Supporting adoption of two separate drafts.
>
> Regards,
> Wilson Chen
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: tram [mailto:tram-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Pal Martinsen
> > (palmarti)
> > Sent: 2014年7月8日 4:10
> > To: tram@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [tram] Two new authentication mechanisms
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Supporting adoption of two separate drafts.
> > (And if time permits I will try to implement it on the client side.)
> >
> > .-.
> > Pål-Erik
> >
> > On 07 Jul 2014, at 19:10, Oleg Moskalenko <mom040267@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > I support the adoption of separate drafts.
> > >
> > > Oleg
> > >
> > >> On Jul 7, 2014, at 4:23 AM, "Anca Zamfir (ancaz)" <ancaz@cisco.com>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> +1
> > >> Support adoption as separate documents.
> > >> -anca
> > >>
> > >>> On 7/1/14 10:00 AM, "Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)" <rmohanr@cisco.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> +1
> > >>>
> > >>> Support adoption of both the documents and should be left as
> seperate.
> > >>>
> > >>> Ram
> > >>>
> > >>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>> From: "Gonzalo Salgueiro   (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com>
> > >>> Date: Tuesday, 1 July 2014 12:28 am
> > >>> To: Simon Perreault <simon@per.reau.lt>
> > >>> Cc: "tram@ietf.org" <tram@ietf.org>
> > >>> Subject: Re: [tram] Two new authentication mechanisms
> > >>>
> > >>>> +1
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Support adoption of both docs and they should be left as separate.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Cheers,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Gonzalo
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Jun 30, 2014, at 2:46 PM, Alan Johnston
> > >>>> <alan.b.johnston@gmail.com>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Agree with Tiru on both points.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> - Alan -
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)
> > >>>>> <tireddy@cisco.com> wrote:
> > >>>>> I support adoption of both drafts. I think there is no interaction
> > >>>>> required between these two drafts. For example If third party
> > >>>>> authorization is used then ORIGIN attribute could be used by the
> > >>>>> TURN server for logging purpose.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> -Tiru
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>>>>> From: tram [mailto:tram-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Simon
> > >>>>> Perreault
> > >>>>>> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 6:51 PM
> > >>>>>> To: tram@ietf.org
> > >>>>>> Subject: [tram] Two new authentication mechanisms
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> TRAMsters,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> We are soliciting discussion on the potential adoption as
> > >>>>> working-group
> > >>>>>> documents of these two drafts:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-johnston-tram-stun-origin
> > >>>>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-reddy-tram-turn-third-party-auth
> > >>>>>> z
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> They would be targeted at fulfilling milestone 4 ("Nov 2014 -
> > >>>>>> Send
> > >>>>> new
> > >>>>>> authentication mechanism(s) to IESG for publication as Proposed
> > >>>>> Standard").
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> If you would like to see one or both of the drafts adopted, or if
> > >>>>>> you
> > >>>>> are opposed,
> > >>>>>> please explain why. Authors, we will assume you are for adoption
> > >>>>>> of
> > >>>>> your own
> > >>>>>> drafts.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Please consider the interactions between the two drafts. Is there
> > >>>>> anything
> > >>>>>> interesting or problematic? What about overlap in function? Is
> > >>>>>> there
> > >>>>> any? If so,
> > >>>>>> is it necessary or problematic?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Let's take two weeks to discuss this.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>> Simon & Gonzalo
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>>>> tram mailing list
> > >>>>>> tram@ietf.org
> > >>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>>> tram mailing list
> > >>>>> tram@ietf.org
> > >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>>> tram mailing list
> > >>>>> tram@ietf.org
> > >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram
> > >>>>
> > >>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>> tram mailing list
> > >>>> tram@ietf.org
> > >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram
> > >>>
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> tram mailing list
> > >>> tram@ietf.org
> > >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> tram mailing list
> > >> tram@ietf.org
> > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > tram mailing list
> > > tram@ietf.org
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > tram mailing list
> > tram@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram
> _______________________________________________
> tram mailing list
> tram@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram
>