IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpsocket-26 started

Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no> Sat, 26 February 2011 13:58 UTC

Return-Path: <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79AC73A692F for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 05:58:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h1PrCM-CtkfM for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 05:58:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-out1.uio.no (mail-out1.uio.no [129.240.10.57]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 625923A6929 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 05:58:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-mx3.uio.no ([129.240.10.44]) by mail-out1.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1PtKgJ-00054J-IE; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 14:59:35 +0100
Received: from cm-84.208.175.27.getinternet.no ([84.208.175.27] helo=[192.168.0.199]) by mail-mx3.uio.no with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) user michawe (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1PtKgJ-0000np-4h; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 14:59:35 +0100
Message-Id: <4F964A0F-1868-4EC7-9E98-732A76C2D80A@ifi.uio.no>
From: Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
To: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <201102080311.p183BoXh025565@sj-core-5.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Subject: Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpsocket-26 started
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 14:59:13 +0100
References: <201102080311.p183BoXh025565@sj-core-5.cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
X-UiO-Ratelimit-Test: rcpts/h 2 msgs/h 1 sum rcpts/h 2 sum msgs/h 1 total rcpts 6949 max rcpts/h 36 ratelimit 0
X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-5.0, required=5.0, autolearn=disabled, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL=-5, uiobl=NO, uiouri=NO)
X-UiO-Scanned: D82CC38C884F750DF92CF9545CE4EA8AB23FA1AA
X-UiO-SPAM-Test: remote_host: 84.208.175.27 spam_score: -49 maxlevel 80 minaction 2 bait 0 mail/h: 1 total 511 max/h 13 blacklist 0 greylist 0 ratelimit 0
Cc: tsvwg <tsvwg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 13:58:42 -0000

I also think that this is an extremely useful document and would like  
to see it as an RFC; and being version number 26, it has gone through  
enough iterations, I suppose  :-)

There's really not much of a point in specifying a transport protocol  
without providing its API IMO (and I'm looking in the direction of  
DCCP when I say this...)


On Feb 8, 2011, at 4:10 AM, James M. Polk wrote:

> TSVWG
>
> I am starting the WGLC for
>
> "Sockets API Extensions for Stream Control Transmission Protocol  
> (SCTP)"
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpsocket/
>
> this is a 2 week WGLC, ending February 22nd, 2011 or when the chairs  
> feel the WG has reviewed the draft and reached consensus to progress  
> towards the ADs with the goal of becoming a proposed standard (PS)  
> RFC.
>
> The chairs require substantive feedback from the WG regarding this  
> draft before consensus can be called.
>
> I will be the document shepherd.
>
> James
> TSVWG chair
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email