IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpsocket-26 started

"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <bidulock@openss7.org> Tue, 08 February 2011 03:51 UTC

Return-Path: <bidulock@openss7.org>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44C8C3A69F9 for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 19:51:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5yJN4EXgDni4 for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 19:51:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gw.openss7.com (gw.openss7.com [206.75.119.236]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F2B43A6C06 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 19:51:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wilbur.pigworks.openss7.net (ns5.evil.openss7.net [192.168.9.5]) by gw.openss7.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id p183ptwR020771; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 20:51:55 -0700
Received: from wilbur.pigworks.openss7.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wilbur.pigworks.openss7.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id p183ptKx013633; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 20:51:55 -0700
Received: (from brian@localhost) by wilbur.pigworks.openss7.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id p183psXX013632; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 20:51:54 -0700
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 20:51:54 -0700
From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <bidulock@openss7.org>
To: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpsocket-26 started
Message-ID: <20110208035154.GA13501@openss7.org>
Mail-Followup-To: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>, tsvwg <tsvwg@ietf.org>
References: <201102080311.p183BoXh025565@sj-core-5.cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <201102080311.p183BoXh025565@sj-core-5.cisco.com>
Organization: http://www.openss7.org/
Dsn-Notification-To: <bidulock@openss7.org>
X-Spam-To: <blockme@openss7.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Cc: tsvwg <tsvwg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: bidulock@openss7.org
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 03:51:54 -0000

James,

The intended status of the document is INFORMATIONAL not PS.

Was that just a typo?

If not, my first comment is that any RFC issued for C-language
APIs must be INFORMATIONAL and not PS.

--brian

James M. Polk wrote:                         (Mon, 07 Feb 2011 21:10:53)
> TSVWG
>
> I am starting the WGLC for
>
> "Sockets API Extensions for Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP)"
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpsocket/
>
> this is a 2 week WGLC, ending February 22nd, 2011 or when the chairs  
> feel the WG has reviewed the draft and reached consensus to progress  
> towards the ADs with the goal of becoming a proposed standard (PS) RFC.
>
> The chairs require substantive feedback from the WG regarding this draft 
> before consensus can be called.
>
> I will be the document shepherd.
>
> James
> TSVWG chair
>

-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
bidulock@openss7.org
http://www.openss7.org/

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status