IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpsocket-26 started

Robin Seggelmann <seggelmann@fh-muenster.de> Mon, 28 February 2011 07:54 UTC

Return-Path: <seggelmann@fh-muenster.de>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC0593A6AD4 for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 23:54:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZQ-WPffPyhNo for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 23:54:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtprelay05.ispgateway.de (smtprelay05.ispgateway.de [80.67.31.100]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4FF53A6AC8 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 23:54:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [212.201.121.94] (helo=[10.0.1.103]) by smtprelay05.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from <seggelmann@fh-muenster.de>) id 1PtxxA-00087Z-Dk; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:55:36 +0100
Subject: Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpsocket-26 started
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Robin Seggelmann <seggelmann@fh-muenster.de>
In-Reply-To: <201102080311.p183BoXh025565@sj-core-5.cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:55:42 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D4944FE1-5F96-443E-8237-7DB410F2843A@fh-muenster.de>
References: <201102080311.p183BoXh025565@sj-core-5.cisco.com>
To: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
X-Df-Sender: mail@robin-seggelmann.de
Cc: tsvwg <tsvwg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 07:54:38 -0000

Dear all,

I have also read the draft and have been working with the SCTP API for quite some time. Among other SCTP related projects, I implemented SCTP support for OpenSSL and the API draft has always been a very helpful resource and should become an RFC as soon as possible.

Best regards
Robin


On Feb 8, 2011, at 4:10 AM, James M. Polk wrote:

> TSVWG
> 
> I am starting the WGLC for
> 
> "Sockets API Extensions for Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP)"
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpsocket/
> 
> this is a 2 week WGLC, ending February 22nd, 2011 or when the chairs feel the WG has reviewed the draft and reached consensus to progress towards the ADs with the goal of becoming a proposed standard (PS) RFC.
> 
> The chairs require substantive feedback from the WG regarding this draft before consensus can be called.
> 
> I will be the document shepherd.
> 
> James
> TSVWG chair
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email