[tsvwg] Requesting TSVWG adoption of SCE draft-morton-tsvwg-sce

"Rodney W. Grimes" <4bone@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Thu, 14 November 2019 13:50 UTC

Return-Path: <4bone@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 353CC120059 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 05:50:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.498
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.498 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.4, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mmsI7_uNYa1R for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 05:50:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net []) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFCE5120025 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 05:50:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (localhost []) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id xAEDoA7e048929 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 05:50:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from 4bone@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net)
Received: (from 4bone@localhost) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id xAEDo99J048928 for tsvwg@ietf.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 05:50:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from 4bone)
From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <4bone@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
Message-Id: <201911141350.xAEDo99J048928@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
To: tsvwg@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 05:50:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/C-QKe11_gncCOu2ivBmv9ZkhAQI>
Subject: [tsvwg] Requesting TSVWG adoption of SCE draft-morton-tsvwg-sce
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 13:50:13 -0000

Hello tsvwg list members,

It is our intent to ask for adoption by the TSVWG of draft-morton-tsvwg-sce (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-morton-tsvwg-sce-01) during the IETF/106 Singapore TSVWG session.

The TSVWG chairs have provided the following guidelines for this adoption request:
(1) The WG chairs want to see interest in SCE technology beyond the draft authors in order to adopt the SCE draft.   This will include surveying the room in Singapore (e.g., who has read this
(2) Coexistence of the L4S and SCE experiments is a concern that will need to be addressed by the WG if the SCE draft is adopted, and hence is in scope for discussion of this adoption request
.  In particular, absence of a coexistence plan (e.g., to deal with the different uses of the ECT(1) codepoint by L4S and SCE) is not an automatic barrier to WG adoption of the SCE draft.
(3) The TCPM WG chairs have indicated TCPM WG willingness to consider complementary TCP work needed to complete SCE functionality.  In particular, draft-grimes-tcpm-tcpsce is likely to be inc
luded in the TCPM Singapore agenda for Friday morning.
Rod Grimes                                                 rgrimes@freebsd.org