IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tsvwg] algorithm 5 (was Re: WGLC for Port Randomization starts now (April 1st))

Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar> Thu, 28 May 2009 21:37 UTC

Return-Path: <fernando.gont.netbook.win@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 545AE3A6917 for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 May 2009 14:37:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.578
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.578 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.021, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T9bMGDam-P-Y for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 May 2009 14:36:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gx0-f164.google.com (mail-gx0-f164.google.com [209.85.217.164]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62D803A6D52 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 May 2009 14:36:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gxk8 with SMTP id 8so793162gxk.13 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 May 2009 14:38:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fNmEwFiE7saYIMsvZ/J0ED3FjNQNaZwLer9FiQdybQg=; b=vg8IhotJwvb+LiZjmgRSXbATrY/kwvCCosZadTZ+U58Kfb19SY5jt++3ZtddCOHbLB P0YkK3eaANcOquoQM5YnabyQ0Piv69bkAUfAeFK0ThzCCv+iY5AnwDYk0Oar2RQpicJ4 N1FA7rbi3nbj6TCugWPn4UOghW/ckcHkAg1v0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=q9dJ28T8hii+41TUCCD5cu6JSStPV+yXh2DzEQJs9nUZSbk/JtySln3EkTQDL/2EM2 AkWNd/Nan7fvlEmF6jnQt6oNqru77nbFyQP2UvsjjV/yYEuuoTbkJgIxMCPdp1ugbPNM icYG6JQJg0wqVkBgd0pmV6Qy7ytGc3iHseNak=
Received: by 10.100.46.3 with SMTP id t3mr466537ant.179.1243546719371; Thu, 28 May 2009 14:38:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?168.77.196.154? (154.196.lacnicxii.lacnic.net [168.77.196.154]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 26sm880000aga.24.2009.05.28.14.38.37 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 28 May 2009 14:38:38 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Fernando Gont <fernando.gont.netbook.win@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4A1F045A.5080800@gont.com.ar>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 18:38:34 -0300
From: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mallman@icir.org
References: <20090528150223.0F31729BA47@lawyers.icir.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090528150223.0F31729BA47@lawyers.icir.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
OpenPGP: id=D076FFF1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Alfred Hönes <ah@tr-sys.de>, "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>, tsvwg <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Tsvwg] algorithm 5 (was Re: WGLC for Port Randomization starts now (April 1st))
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 21:37:05 -0000

Mark Allman wrote:

>>> (It is my fault the
>>> I-D is wrong.  The paper is not clear enough.)  So, I'd prefer if these
>>> were synced up just to avoid confusion.  
>> Yes, that's what I was meaning to do.
> 
> To me you sync them and call it a day.  I.e., I see no reason for
> describing another riff.

The only reason is that we did describe both riffs for Alg #1 vs. Alg #2
(i.e., incremental retry v.s random retry).

But I'm fine either way. Thoughts?

Kind regards,
-- 
Fernando Gont
e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@acm.org
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email