Re: [Uri-review] Request for review of "ab:" URI scheme

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Fri, 22 April 2011 18:14 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E969CE07CB for <uri-review@ietfc.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 11:14:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.572
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.572 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.027, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1xbSsofZxzRA for <uri-review@ietfc.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 11:14:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rufus.isode.com (rufus.isode.com [62.3.217.251]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E2DFE06A3 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 11:14:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [188.29.6.68] (188.29.6.68.threembb.co.uk [188.29.6.68]) by rufus.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPA id <TbHFfwBK4wgR@rufus.isode.com>; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 19:14:25 +0100
Message-ID: <4DB1C551.9050501@isode.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 19:13:37 +0100
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
To: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTim8eWcWwKfyERghK2tuSP1rK0SdsA@mail.gmail.com> <cau0r6hqn16pgbr5p6adqaj9rjlns7cdlk@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <BANLkTinZ+988kjip_KvOfG=9HF5DBMptrA@mail.gmail.com> <4DB1AD06.2070004@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4DB1AD06.2070004@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: uri-review@ietf.org, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, draft-ietf-sieve-external-lists.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] Request for review of "ab:" URI scheme
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 18:14:29 -0000

Hi Mykyta,

Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:

> 22.04.2011 18:35, Barry Leiba wrote:

 [...]

>> Huh?  I don't understand what you're getting at.  The contact
>> information is correct, and isn't related to who has change control
>> (the IESG).
>
> The "Contact", according to RFC 4395 is:
>
>>   Person (including contact information) to contact for further
>>        information.
>
> (Organizations are also permitted).
>
> The mailing list cannot be 'Contact'.

You might be correct from a pedantic standpoint, but mailing lists were 
used as Contact quite often recently. They are more reliable than a 
single person.