IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uri-review] Request for review of "ab:" URI scheme

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Fri, 22 April 2011 18:19 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84854E07EF for <uri-review@ietfc.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 11:19:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.574
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.574 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.025, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hpe49v7px8Ab for <uri-review@ietfc.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 11:19:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rufus.isode.com (rufus.isode.com [62.3.217.251]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6679E07D7 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 11:19:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [188.29.6.68] (188.29.6.68.threembb.co.uk [188.29.6.68]) by rufus.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPA id <TbHGtwBK470m@rufus.isode.com>; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 19:19:38 +0100
Message-ID: <4DB1C690.8050304@isode.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 19:18:56 +0100
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
To: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTim8eWcWwKfyERghK2tuSP1rK0SdsA@mail.gmail.com> <4DB184E0.1050606@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4DB184E0.1050606@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: uri-review@ietf.org, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, draft-ietf-sieve-external-lists.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] Request for review of "ab:" URI scheme
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 18:19:51 -0000

Hi Mykyta,

Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:

> 21.04.2011 20:36, Barry Leiba wrote:

 [...]

>>   Relevant publications:  this RFC
>>
>>   Contact:  Sieve mailing list <sieve@ietf.org>    
>>
> Shouldn't this be "Sieve WG <sieve@ietf.org>".  Maybe the same is 
> below - it should be just IESG, shouldn't it?

The Sieve WG is likely to close at some point, however the mailing list 
is likely to remain. So calling this "Sieve mailing list" is more 
appropriate.

I don't think having IESG as the Contact is a good idea either. The 
Contact field is an email address to use for asking about the 
registration, it would be much better to have a more relevant (specific) 
email address.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email