IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uri-review] Request for review of "ab:" URI scheme

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Sun, 24 April 2011 21:29 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4FDDE06A1 for <uri-review@ietfc.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 14:29:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.444
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.444 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.155, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Stk9BPXP6sa4 for <uri-review@ietfc.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 14:29:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rufus.isode.com (rufus.isode.com [62.3.217.251]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC95BE0613 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 14:29:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [188.28.175.146] (188.28.175.146.threembb.co.uk [188.28.175.146]) by rufus.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPA id <TbSWIwBK42hE@rufus.isode.com>; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 22:29:08 +0100
Message-ID: <4DB495F3.3050808@isode.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 22:28:19 +0100
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
References: <BANLkTim8eWcWwKfyERghK2tuSP1rK0SdsA@mail.gmail.com> <cau0r6hqn16pgbr5p6adqaj9rjlns7cdlk@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <BANLkTinZ+988kjip_KvOfG=9HF5DBMptrA@mail.gmail.com> <4DB1AD06.2070004@gmail.com> <BANLkTiktFL1kSt1GLkLeYbfJ7A_tr5DBBg@mail.gmail.com> <4DB26464.2000301@gmail.com> <BANLkTim6+QzSeZfb-9P7kF-108LVfccFUw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTim6+QzSeZfb-9P7kF-108LVfccFUw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: uri-review@ietf.org, draft-ietf-sieve-external-lists.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] Request for review of "ab:" URI scheme
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 21:29:12 -0000

Barry Leiba wrote:

>>>The "addrbook" URI takes th form of <addrbook-uri> rule below, defined
>>>using ABNF [RFC5234]:
>>>
>>>addrbook-uri = "addrbook:" addrbook [ "?" extensions]
>>>addrbook       = segment
>>>extensions     = query
>>>
>>>where <segment> and <query> are defined in Appendix A of RFC 3986
>>>[RFC3986]
>>>      
>>>
>OK, that seems harmless.  I'll change that.
>  
>
+1.

>>4395 has even no mention of "ABNF" or its full name.  Moreover, having 4395
>>document as an *Informative* reference is something like a tradition in
>>URI-scheme-specifying docs :-).
>>    
>>
>I'm happy to change it to informative if Alexey agrees.
>
I don't have a strong opinion on Informative versa Normative for RFC 
4395. This is usually a border case.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email