Re: [Uri-review] Request for review of "ab:" URI scheme

[Barry Leiba <[e-mail]>]

> The problem is that you are enumerating values like "ab:default" and
> "ab:friends". Since it does not really make sense to write, instead,
> "ab:%64efault", or, for that matter, "AB:default", I do think it is
> important to re-inforce that this is URI processing and not keyword
> matching. It would be well-defined without the reminder, but there's
> little reason to expect implementers to get this right on their own.

ACK.

> (I would probably make an example with something like "AB:%64efAulT"
> and put up a note saying the example demonstrates that the scheme
> name is case-insensitive and that escapes must be processed properly;
> I am not sure if the draft defines if "default" is case-sensitive.)

ACK.  Will do.

Barry