Re: [Uri-review] [sipcore] Proposal: sip6 URI scheme

On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Rick van Rein <rick@openfortress.nl> wrote:

> Hello Olle,
>
> > A new URI scheme doesn't make any sense, since a SIP uri can be resolved
> to many different hosts using NAPTR/SRV records.
>
> This only helps with the SIP communication -- but it gives no certainty
> about RTP.  Interoperability between IPv4-only and IPv6-only relating to
> media can only be found when trying to setup a call, right?
>
> > A phone that is dual stack can register with two contacts, one for each
> address family. ICE will take care of media handling.
>
> There is no formal relation between the IP version used for SIP and used
> for RTP.  This is what I am proposing to solve with sip6:
>

[ABN] There is no need for any formal relation between signalling and
media. if you can share your use case you can get the useful replies.

Theoretically, it is acceptable to use different addressing schemes for
signalling and media. AFAIK, There is no constraint to use same IP version
for both media and signalling.

It is very well possible to publish the IPV6 media address (in SDP) whereas
IPv4 is being used for SIP signalling purposes.

>
>
> Thanks,
>  -Rick
> _______________________________________________
> sipcore mailing list
> sipcore@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore
>

-- 
Thanks,
Nataraju A.B.