Re: [Uri-review] [sipcore] Proposal: sip6 URI scheme

Rick van Rein <rick@openfortress.nl> Fri, 27 April 2012 05:21 UTC

Return-Path: <rick@openfortress.nl>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3954E21F8615; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 22:21:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.828
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.828 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.218, BAYES_05=-1.11, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20D7rIMDF2dH; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 22:21:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fame.vanrein.org (openfortress.nl [213.189.19.244]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A17E21F861B; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 22:21:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from phantom.vanrein.org (phantom.vanrein.org [83.161.146.46]) by fame.vanrein.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CA8A4040D1; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 06:21:09 +0100 (BST)
Received: by phantom.vanrein.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EA9E92255C; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 05:29:33 +0000 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 05:29:33 +0000
From: Rick van Rein <rick@openfortress.nl>
To: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <20120427052933.GA31576@newphantom.local>
References: <20120426092725.GC27002@newphantom.local> <0d9801cd240f$456579c0$d0306d40$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <0d9801cd240f$456579c0$d0306d40$@com>
X-My-Coolest-Hack: http://rick.vanrein.org/linux/badram -> Exploit broken RAM
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Cc: uri-review@ietf.org, sipcore@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] [sipcore] Proposal: sip6 URI scheme
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 05:21:13 -0000

Hello,

> > Your feedback is kindly welcomed.
> 
> It's a layering violation, and -- worse -- will cause far more harm
> than it could possibly help.  Please don't do this.

Thanks all for looking into this proposal.  It is clear that it will not
gain wide acceptance, and should not be taken any further.

I'm withdrawing the proposal.

Best wishes,
 -Rick