Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes
Lisa Dusseault <lisa.dusseault@gmail.com> Fri, 11 September 2009 19:11 UTC
Return-Path: <lisa.dusseault@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 168033A6AE6; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 12:11:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.717
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.717 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.118, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bKB9cRx4xenV; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 12:11:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vw0-f201.google.com (mail-vw0-f201.google.com [209.85.212.201]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B4CE3A69A4; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 12:11:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vws39 with SMTP id 39so878183vws.29 for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 12:12:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=1FKEUNn63GePrn2dealairJseSkJH1VQVzPoDNxCrIM=; b=rzYVlIAmWgpU0fphRam4kN46pe66okqv8GLKbE4IHZYqBQZdo0ZoltsC0GxaoGHl1f d1fz1J1m9mWF3w+nXDkfG/vRYJC0lSVVwxbIb1YsAfVdqXswnWv8XFju9fPGdVwZ3ukO f9RfBNJC/KlQ36S2H3vf0jcdUKx0OiZGlIAGw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=dqlry+maGm+bGaR0x4O53LFeCV0GIEB1fsGRYzvWHqpYZkbsNp3f6X2732gL6Tl8cT vIveTcVY2AelnapNEjZsm0twFX+uJy1I0GnVQk9tNGiE6m3V3MsTmwpzTU4BXqMBFQx6 IqK3WPW/NJw3vA1zxcDalFTUbgtnqjtgHiock=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.109.41 with SMTP id h41mr4171190vcp.54.1252696332915; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 12:12:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4AA70134.28006.1928A41F@dan.tobias.name>
References: <OF22CD1320.96C55266-ON85257610.004AB599-85257610.004BC9CA@lotus.com> <4AA2A630.32731.824DABF@dan.tobias.name> <1252444455.16404.646.camel@dbooth-laptop> <4AA70134.28006.1928A41F@dan.tobias.name>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 12:12:12 -0700
Message-ID: <ca722a9e0909111212l29d378afn8a97dfee15247b2b@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa.dusseault@gmail.com>
To: "Daniel R. Tobias" <dan@tobias.name>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 13:27:25 -0700
Cc: URI <uri@w3.org>, hybi@ietf.org, uri-review@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:11:45 -0000
Didn't Vernor Vinge sketch something like this out as part of the multi-solar-system-spanning network in the Zones of Thought Sci Fi series? His future programmers needed mind-altering substances (well beyond caffeine, of course) to change any small part of the system and they still caused chaos with every change. Your addressing example provides additional concreteness and realism to the scenario :) Lisa On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 6:01 AM, Daniel R. Tobias<dan@tobias.name> wrote: > I wonder if the "HTTP Uber Alles" crowd, if they were active 20 years > ago, would be insisting that everything, including that newfangled > HTTP protocol, be expressed in the form of a Gopher address, or > perhaps FTP or Telnet, or maybe an e-mail address with the standard, > adopted by the owner of the address, that the subject line contain > the actual protocol intended to be used? > > I also wonder if, should their side win all its battles, 1000 years > from now all URIs in use will be at least 1000 characters long, of > which at least 800 of these characters will be fossilized deadwood of > obsolete protocols that are preserved as magic incantations to begin > a URI. So they'll be something like: > > http://ipp.solarsystem.net/earth/galacticgateway.net/andromeda/tachyon > .protocol.net/ ...[snip]... /actualsite.actualgalaxy/path-in-site > > where "ipp.solarsystem.net", under "http", is the magic indicator of > the InterPlanetaryProtocol that became dominant in 2067, and was > followed by the actual address being reached by that protocol, > starting with its home planet, but then "galacticgateway.net" within > "earth" became the magic string to indicate that you are actually > using the InterGalacticProtocol which became dominant in 2152, and > similarly the "tachyon.protocol.net" signifies the Tachyon Protocol > that caught on around 2272. > > User agent identifiers for the browsers people use with their 31st > century protocols are similarly long and convoluted, beginning with > "Mozilla/5.0" and containing references to MSIE, Gecko, and various > other browser names and codenames that were trendy at some point or > other over the millennium. > > -- > == Dan == > Dan's Mail Format Site: http://mailformat.dan.info/ > Dan's Web Tips: http://webtips.dan.info/ > Dan's Domain Site: http://domains.dan.info/ > > > > > > >
- [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Ian Hickson
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Julian Reschke
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Julian Reschke
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Greg Wilkins
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Ian Hickson
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Daniel R. Tobias
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Chris Anderson
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Julian Reschke
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Pieter Hintjens
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Jamie Lokier
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Daniel R. Tobias
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Roy T. Fielding
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Kristof Zelechovski
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Kristof Zelechovski
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Kristof Zelechovski
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Kristof Zelechovski
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Kristof Zelechovski
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Greg Wilkins
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Jamie Lokier
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Jamie Lokier
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes David Orchard
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Kristof Zelechovski
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Julian Reschke
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Julian Reschke
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Ian Hickson
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Ian Hickson
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Toby Inkster
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Roy T. Fielding
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Jamie Lokier
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Jamie Lokier
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Jamie Lokier
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Křištof Želechovski
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Erik Wilde
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Jamie Lokier
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes noah_mendelsohn
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Jamie Lokier
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes noah_mendelsohn
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes John Kemp
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Ian Hickson
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Joseph A Holsten
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Julian Reschke
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Ian Hickson
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Kristof Zelechovski
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Julian Reschke
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Ian Hickson
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Joseph A Holsten
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Julian Reschke
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Julian Reschke
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Joseph A Holsten
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Julian Reschke
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Julian Reschke
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Ian Hickson
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Jamie Lokier
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Toby Inkster
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Daniel R. Tobias
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Kristof Zelechovski
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Kristof Zelechovski
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Julian Reschke
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Kristof Zelechovski
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Daniel R. Tobias
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Daniel R. Tobias
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Toby Inkster
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Křištof Želechovski
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Jamie Lokier
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Křištof Želechovski
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Jamie Lokier
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Lisa Dusseault
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Infinity Linden
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Lloyd Wood
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Kristof Zelechovski
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Ian Hickson
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Julian Reschke
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Ian Hickson
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Julian Reschke
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Julian Reschke
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Roy T. Fielding
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Julian Reschke
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Ian Hickson