Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes
"Daniel R. Tobias" <dan@tobias.name> Wed, 09 September 2009 01:13 UTC
Return-Path: <dan@tobias.name>
X-Original-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C72D3A6AB3; Tue, 8 Sep 2009 18:13:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.577
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.577 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.022, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y9KvJR-ty6uF; Tue, 8 Sep 2009 18:13:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from looneymail-a3.g.dreamhost.com (caibbdcaaaaf.dreamhost.com [208.113.200.5]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88BB73A69B5; Tue, 8 Sep 2009 18:13:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.100] (c-98-219-95-0.hsd1.fl.comcast.net [98.219.95.0]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by looneymail-a3.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F07527B48; Tue, 8 Sep 2009 18:13:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Daniel R. Tobias" <dan@tobias.name>
Organization: Barely
To: URI <uri@w3.org>, hybi@ietf.org, uri-review@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 21:13:24 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <4AA70134.28006.1928A41F@dan.tobias.name>
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <1252444455.16404.646.camel@dbooth-laptop>
References: <OF22CD1320.96C55266-ON85257610.004AB599-85257610.004BC9CA@lotus.com>, <4AA2A630.32731.824DABF@dan.tobias.name>, <1252444455.16404.646.camel@dbooth-laptop>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.51)
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-description: Mail message body
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 01:13:25 -0000
I wonder if the "HTTP Uber Alles" crowd, if they were active 20 years ago, would be insisting that everything, including that newfangled HTTP protocol, be expressed in the form of a Gopher address, or perhaps FTP or Telnet, or maybe an e-mail address with the standard, adopted by the owner of the address, that the subject line contain the actual protocol intended to be used? I also wonder if, should their side win all its battles, 1000 years from now all URIs in use will be at least 1000 characters long, of which at least 800 of these characters will be fossilized deadwood of obsolete protocols that are preserved as magic incantations to begin a URI. So they'll be something like: http://ipp.solarsystem.net/earth/galacticgateway.net/andromeda/tachyon .protocol.net/ ...[snip]... /actualsite.actualgalaxy/path-in-site where "ipp.solarsystem.net", under "http", is the magic indicator of the InterPlanetaryProtocol that became dominant in 2067, and was followed by the actual address being reached by that protocol, starting with its home planet, but then "galacticgateway.net" within "earth" became the magic string to indicate that you are actually using the InterGalacticProtocol which became dominant in 2152, and similarly the "tachyon.protocol.net" signifies the Tachyon Protocol that caught on around 2272. User agent identifiers for the browsers people use with their 31st century protocols are similarly long and convoluted, beginning with "Mozilla/5.0" and containing references to MSIE, Gecko, and various other browser names and codenames that were trendy at some point or other over the millennium. -- == Dan == Dan's Mail Format Site: http://mailformat.dan.info/ Dan's Web Tips: http://webtips.dan.info/ Dan's Domain Site: http://domains.dan.info/
- [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Ian Hickson
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Julian Reschke
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Julian Reschke
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Greg Wilkins
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Ian Hickson
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Daniel R. Tobias
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Chris Anderson
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Julian Reschke
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Pieter Hintjens
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Jamie Lokier
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Daniel R. Tobias
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Roy T. Fielding
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Kristof Zelechovski
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Kristof Zelechovski
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Kristof Zelechovski
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Kristof Zelechovski
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Kristof Zelechovski
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Greg Wilkins
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Jamie Lokier
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Jamie Lokier
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes David Orchard
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Kristof Zelechovski
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Julian Reschke
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Julian Reschke
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Ian Hickson
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Ian Hickson
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Toby Inkster
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Roy T. Fielding
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Jamie Lokier
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Jamie Lokier
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Jamie Lokier
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Křištof Želechovski
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Erik Wilde
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Jamie Lokier
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes noah_mendelsohn
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Jamie Lokier
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes noah_mendelsohn
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes John Kemp
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Ian Hickson
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Joseph A Holsten
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Julian Reschke
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Ian Hickson
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Kristof Zelechovski
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Julian Reschke
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Ian Hickson
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Joseph A Holsten
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Julian Reschke
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Julian Reschke
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Joseph A Holsten
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Julian Reschke
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Julian Reschke
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Ian Hickson
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Jamie Lokier
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Toby Inkster
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Daniel R. Tobias
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Kristof Zelechovski
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Kristof Zelechovski
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Julian Reschke
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Kristof Zelechovski
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Daniel R. Tobias
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Daniel R. Tobias
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Toby Inkster
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes David Booth
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Křištof Želechovski
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Jamie Lokier
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Křištof Želechovski
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Jamie Lokier
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Lisa Dusseault
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Infinity Linden
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Lloyd Wood
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Kristof Zelechovski
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Ian Hickson
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Julian Reschke
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Ian Hickson
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Julian Reschke
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Julian Reschke
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Roy T. Fielding
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Julian Reschke
- Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes Ian Hickson