IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uta] Adoption call for draft-sheffer-uta-rfc7525bis-00

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Mon, 27 April 2020 18:42 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0384A3A0CC4 for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 11:42:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1536-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=iecc.com header.b=sPXCJlvk; dkim=fail (1536-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=taugh.com header.b=RjghjLUd
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dEHV4Gry4d8U for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 11:42:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 212EC3A0CC3 for <uta@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 11:42:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 71270 invoked by uid 100); 27 Apr 2020 18:42:20 -0000
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 18:42:20 -0000
Message-ID: <r8792c$25aa$1@gal.iecc.com>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: uta@ietf.org
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:cleverness; s=1165e.5ea7278c.k2004; i=news@user.iecc.com; bh=mvpmPWIWMJKi1J0qVNVb/TjJu00Lkhs4MQ9w2Oybp0A=; b=sPXCJlvk9vit90aBXmPM+AqCOa73m8YX2lxh3cyrsez7lJDSinI58d14hdHERv3m/OG9nD8mYVQYu19iSjGilK9FS055cGGEpF9FQ0b/CIT25VvZEMBlbYkoo07aaqUHGUPUIcr70gOv6iTRT2Da6hmU4yYp/4rjwLB9gC1/QrAqAwsSEQsc40JNMVvogm6vEMGGJIOaREVgSTIBcOU5je7sx6GS53seYc0NLabI0Q8J+p/K5DJMSyidx20+grKf
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:cleverness; s=1165e.5ea7278c.k2004; olt=news@user.iecc.com; bh=mvpmPWIWMJKi1J0qVNVb/TjJu00Lkhs4MQ9w2Oybp0A=; b=RjghjLUd6WiyrrnFixIsk4imoA1FMBq1daLrCQQl+YYjzjuLBUwt40lt2XH6+1f545g2qFzwEQmBShWopIyRAX/LH2E3KV67kvdy1lj09vCA2swRkKKLovu8bpWUc0rc5GF/T/LUuHwJY6pfwm3zKiFfF79fQcunjQRzvobN6iAvrefUdbcFZJ56L8KFkpx7L1d5TJjwmaXaYJKtebwJedLgxgvyr6HSwpZtRSlJbmuLyHn0tyQtfhHRA9jrkpmF
Organization: Taughannock Networks
References: <004801d61bae$08a61590$19f240b0$@smyslov.net> <1UW7qWO4vA.17rUXhBMkf8@pc8xp> <CAEKAoHTJ4S5Wfkb4KB+ZWQN7JO_Q-DXDcEz5pqd7MPMhyj_CDQ@mail.gmail.com> <9c423d31-4040-ef7f-1779-240a26104344@isode.com>
In-Reply-To: <004801d61bae$08a61590$19f240b0$@smyslov.net> <1UW7qWO4vA.17rUXhBMkf8@pc8xp> <CAEKAoHTJ4S5Wfkb4KB+ZWQN7JO_Q-DXDcEz5pqd7MPMhyj_CDQ@mail.gmail.com> <9c423d31-4040-ef7f-1779-240a26104344@isode.com>
Cleverness: some
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Originator: johnl@iecc.com (John Levine)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/1RwYVE_v9unzxWfL8-wgK_fsQII>
Subject: Re: [Uta] Adoption call for draft-sheffer-uta-rfc7525bis-00
X-BeenThere: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: UTA working group mailing list <uta.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uta/>
List-Post: <mailto:uta@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 18:42:25 -0000

In article <9c423d31-4040-ef7f-1779-240a26104344@isode.com>,
Alexey Melnikov  <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> wrote:
>I don't have any number for SMTP or IMAP, but judging from my own 
>experience: our implementations upgraded to OpenSSL 1.1.1 and we got TLS 
>1.3 enabled for free. I suspect many other people in the same boat.

That's my impression, too.  The mail software I know uses a generic
SSL configuration that only says not to use pre-1.0 SSL, so if you
rebuild it with a new library, you get new stuff automatically.

-- 
Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email