Re: [Uta] Adoption call for draft-sheffer-uta-rfc7525bis-00

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Mon, 27 April 2020 13:43 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6C933A0AC9; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 06:43:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isode.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h-KFeVEAcQHU; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 06:43:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from statler.isode.com (Statler.isode.com [62.232.206.189]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A857F3A0AC6; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 06:43:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1587995006; d=isode.com; s=june2016; i=@isode.com; bh=z4+wifBaIVZuYhVxSrvhPgjLw+fXEKbtEykpNFDo80E=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=P5cY0dV6Wn89kanQ7CSNYpt+2oikiXozYezb3SnOg2lofZC/Zvna6dEvyZkQzwjXO1YgVT Hm/HOZQIvWiUo5TK3fYyC/oE/QlixLL+9n4S9/QxtP8uujSP8YkIeNei7gu9ldLDUEI+1n FP6fHKcESDqfSzfEsYSckG9fVdAkAQ4=;
Received: from [172.27.255.19] (connect.isode.net [172.20.0.72]) by statler.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id <XqbhfgAhH1ds@statler.isode.com>; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 14:43:26 +0100
To: Valery Smyslov <valery@smyslov.net>, uta@ietf.org
Cc: 'Yaron Sheffer' <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>, uta-chairs@ietf.org, 'Ralph Holz' <ralph.holz@gmail.com>, 'Peter Saint-Andre' <stpeter@mozilla.com>
References: <004801d61bae$08a61590$19f240b0$@smyslov.net>
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Message-ID: <5e658352-5a06-fbcc-08d5-e32bf3e9c1da@isode.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 14:43:26 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0
In-Reply-To: <004801d61bae$08a61590$19f240b0$@smyslov.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-GB
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/CWQVwoWz2U3E4bZIik5Cde0M1f4>
Subject: Re: [Uta] Adoption call for draft-sheffer-uta-rfc7525bis-00
X-BeenThere: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: UTA working group mailing list <uta.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uta/>
List-Post: <mailto:uta@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 13:43:32 -0000

Hi,

On 26/04/2020 10:35, Valery Smyslov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> during the last  virtual interim meeting the draft
> draft-sheffer-uta-bcp195bis-00 was presented and the authors asked for its
> adoption.
> The general feeling in the room was in favor of the adoption, however
> the authors were asked to rename it to *-rfc7525-bis.
> The authors have renamed the draft and asked the chairs for its adoption.
> Since our responsible AD thinks agrees that this work is within the charter
> of the WG, the chairs are issuing a formal call for adoption
> to confirm the results we had at the meeting.
>
> This message starts a two weeks call for adoption of the
> draft-sheffer-uta-rfc7525bis-00 draft.
> The call will end up 10 May 2020. Please send your opinions to the list
> before this date.
>
> Please if possible include any reasons supporting your opinion. If you
> support this adoption,
> please indicate whether you are ready to review this draft if it becomes a
> WG document.

I support adoption of this work. I think both TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 
recommendations should be stated at this time, but this is ultimately 
for the WG to decide.

Best Regards,

Alexey