IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uta] Second WGLC for draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis-05

"Olle E. Johansson" <oej@edvina.net> Mon, 14 February 2022 12:02 UTC

Return-Path: <oej@edvina.net>
X-Original-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6795F3A0A21; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 04:02:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WpEnMKSM339p; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 04:02:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp7.webway.se (smtp7.webway.se [IPv6:2a02:920:212e::205]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 144CC3A0A20; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 04:02:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (h-176-10-205-12.A165.corp.bahnhof.se [176.10.205.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp7.webway.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF220217B; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 13:01:58 +0100 (CET)
From: "Olle E. Johansson" <oej@edvina.net>
Message-Id: <02CE6281-D1EC-433E-B844-168D6FBAF101@edvina.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F40292A3-81F3-4966-9714-8477F6F3DC9A"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3693.40.0.1.81\))
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 13:01:57 +0100
In-Reply-To: <021b01d82197$6cf5dc60$46e19520$@smyslov.net>
Cc: uta@ietf.org, draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis@ietf.org, uta-chairs@ietf.org
To: Valery Smyslov <valery@smyslov.net>
References: <021b01d82197$6cf5dc60$46e19520$@smyslov.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3693.40.0.1.81)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/9bCmvZSrIOeO8CcOOGWAu6GcomU>
Subject: Re: [Uta] Second WGLC for draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis-05
X-BeenThere: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: UTA working group mailing list <uta.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uta/>
List-Post: <mailto:uta@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 12:02:12 -0000

A nit-picking small comment. The abstract ends like this:

This document was published as RFC 7525 when the industry was in the midst of its transition to TLS 1.2. Years later this transition is largely complete and TLS 1.3 is widely available. Given the new environment, updated guidance is needed.

When published, this is the needed updated guidance.

“This document updates the guidance, given the new environment.” 

would be better.

/O

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email