IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uta] Second WGLC for draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis-05

"Olle E. Johansson" <oej@edvina.net> Mon, 14 February 2022 12:13 UTC

Return-Path: <oej@edvina.net>
X-Original-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 821B73A0A71; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 04:13:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FhXX4FhGF000; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 04:13:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp7.webway.se (smtp7.webway.se [IPv6:2a02:920:212e::205]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2D133A0A40; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 04:13:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (h-176-10-205-12.A165.corp.bahnhof.se [176.10.205.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp7.webway.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 73B06217B; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 13:13:16 +0100 (CET)
From: "Olle E. Johansson" <oej@edvina.net>
Message-Id: <7C66DF11-FA4F-4FBD-A0A0-33B8701B676D@edvina.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5E64A781-77AD-44D0-9CDF-0A764578E24D"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3693.40.0.1.81\))
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 13:13:15 +0100
In-Reply-To: <021b01d82197$6cf5dc60$46e19520$@smyslov.net>
Cc: Olle E Johansson <oej@edvina.net>, uta@ietf.org, draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis@ietf.org, Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se>, uta-chairs@ietf.org
To: Valery Smyslov <valery@smyslov.net>
References: <021b01d82197$6cf5dc60$46e19520$@smyslov.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3693.40.0.1.81)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/IpLXuG-giB4H4LJEiYEw09L7uX0>
Subject: Re: [Uta] Second WGLC for draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis-05
X-BeenThere: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: UTA working group mailing list <uta.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uta/>
List-Post: <mailto:uta@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 12:13:45 -0000

From the draft:

"Protocol developers are strongly encouraged to register an ALPN identifier for their protocols. This applies to new protocols, as well as well-established protocols such as SMTP.”

I’ve tried to register ALPN for SIP/2.0 for a long time now, but fail to get responses and confusing ones.
It seems unclear whether we need to write new RFCs for SIP in order to get a registration, but that seems wrong to me.


It must be much easier to get this done. 

/O

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email