IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uta] [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis-09

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Fri, 15 July 2022 19:56 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3662EC14F745; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 12:56:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PyS-xqpbPLaL; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 12:56:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x633.google.com (mail-ej1-x633.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::633]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEA11C14F606; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 12:56:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x633.google.com with SMTP id sz17so10740730ejc.9; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 12:56:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=fcH1eFDlPLtE7Ib3KErnOC2Oq4ooysW3LYQeFfN5zz0=; b=WdpvU4lVq7hrUZ5j6BJ+TjMLDB350+i8SFRqrz+QYax2zDcoFGZBGHe5Ym8YJ0ehZw 09MFA9zYZbHcaaFpqoP0p+Au7Zpct/W/YcbnK96diMPp3Mjv8FP7bfPRM88NYr/qXdwi gFyCk5PAhKN+y59kXeXa+tYiHg9cVmNXcq9R8Mgy8pnm574FzjuWles1xRHUa4KLz2Lb PMSSbUl/WNY5yy0V89iy+me6yCEO94cdhv1AB8DNH+noCkTh8ElWVbLOXd8kYB9Y8bW7 x3SUdV0UDaUFk4RDJXP2uYdM9hN+azPKuRHB/pjSsjzPngMA9qXA6kzeQfk6PmoNUfqL ksQQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fcH1eFDlPLtE7Ib3KErnOC2Oq4ooysW3LYQeFfN5zz0=; b=f0i7qW2++ukaNVEYw2itxOAdBFFksTgedhZJndS7jBPdJ8H8olDTns7JL2aBWNLHbD XglTfTiCWuEbiwZubcIRuBe+EoDnZNXTEoI6esW9/8vp8KjK9CMksIWo82seDuqXYFEH GhabjVmlwCJX0EuvLd12AHQ6vHZG47shUcuo2zHkC5KnAmOiUFcRpaoUJKFOq3n0R6dW 0sp9VrAq4DRjv2BGjs1VFWWJNL7sV/u+HTYJ9STyeBhn7yKwh2fv8dOceUTeOQGK2phI V+KrWRs8ThkV4bC9fiLYd0zzCio4VJRXNUeJ3ShV3sqebuA8OxvheD0z8lqXHUt3Tj5+ bgFg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora9QjUz5SvsCn44MhZJtpM2eifnB1iufcDPq6XynKpfDnzA1ej40 a7DL9wr3HzWKE2czs26mInxxYc+hA97tNE8Ft0abFxUrg2o=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1twu97Id0avH8/NvA1b+FAsFaNtAqt++LcTkpIvKNhrh1EBifQyc1WAWO0uuSDCujHuPhoZKMyVULuAR+sNvVI=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:a429:b0:726:2d63:25f7 with SMTP id sg41-20020a170907a42900b007262d6325f7mr15621023ejc.112.1657915016265; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 12:56:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <165728991008.45773.10659091812976572509@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAChr6SzVctA76H5wjjYEbAvSJkb6oag6r=vBs9sXimEZ4EGW8g@mail.gmail.com> <20220715174734.GU26442@kduck.mit.edu> <CAChr6SyvY1O1pXep9XNFxGkgfhz7abF64opDb35HNFEjgHMkzw@mail.gmail.com> <a0372b9d-d59f-81d7-52b8-5ae9362489ed@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <a0372b9d-d59f-81d7-52b8-5ae9362489ed@stpeter.im>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 12:56:45 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6SztgADgk+kbdiTzrQhXW2Sa3z30H643TZRB=G1TXE5+hw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Cc: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>, ART Area <art@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, uta@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009cc50905e3dd6b93"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/HNymh4bLHE57BMQzehlH3BNcOwE>
Subject: Re: [Uta] [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis-09
X-BeenThere: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: UTA working group mailing list <uta.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uta/>
List-Post: <mailto:uta@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 19:56:58 -0000

On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 12:29 PM Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
wrote:

>
> And, surprisingly enough, that's already mentioned in the applicability
> statement section of this document:
>
>     This document does not discuss the use of TLS in constrained-node
>     networks [RFC7228].  For recommendations regarding the profiling of
>     TLS and DTLS for small devices with severe constraints on power,
>     memory, and processing resources, the reader is referred to [RFC7925]
>     and [I-D.ietf-uta-tls13-iot-profile].
>

Hi,

I read those words, but I didn't understand them.

I would suggest capitalizing "Constrained-Node Networks" so it's clear that
reading is required. That is a document I have never seen, and I do read a
lot of them. I would also suggest moving the word "severe", since that term
is really from RFC7228.

thanks,
Rob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email