IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-buraglio-v6ops-ula discussion

Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard@huawei.com> Mon, 01 August 2022 15:18 UTC

Return-Path: <vasilenko.eduard@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 486F5C14CF17 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2022 08:18:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2dzN1Aw7WdCg for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2022 08:18:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 181A7C14CF15 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Aug 2022 08:18:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fraeml706-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.201]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4LxM8V2DxZz67XcG for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Aug 2022 23:13:46 +0800 (CST)
Received: from mscpeml100002.china.huawei.com (7.188.26.75) by fraeml706-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.55) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2375.24; Mon, 1 Aug 2022 17:18:36 +0200
Received: from mscpeml500001.china.huawei.com (7.188.26.142) by mscpeml100002.china.huawei.com (7.188.26.75) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Mon, 1 Aug 2022 18:18:35 +0300
Received: from mscpeml500001.china.huawei.com ([7.188.26.142]) by mscpeml500001.china.huawei.com ([7.188.26.142]) with mapi id 15.01.2375.024; Mon, 1 Aug 2022 18:18:35 +0300
From: Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard@huawei.com>
To: Ed Horley <ed@hexabuild.io>, Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
CC: v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] draft-buraglio-v6ops-ula discussion
Thread-Index: AQHYpbeZ9ezWkP9RC0WJTztRjHUwJ62Z8ZwAgAA1vuA=
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2022 15:18:35 +0000
Message-ID: <23efcafb7c6544dd84b4e49d47d90796@huawei.com>
References: <CABKBHweedb9Cmefy3M+jBkX3P_ML++a2N7SpSKVcZ0gL2U5K8w@mail.gmail.com> <CAE=N4xf-O4MQAQkJLDF7S42RwhTRpk1GncosEnAFjCSsn0Yd5g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAE=N4xf-O4MQAQkJLDF7S42RwhTRpk1GncosEnAFjCSsn0Yd5g@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.81.201.138]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_23efcafb7c6544dd84b4e49d47d90796huaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/-7zIAauHuugVWkfbBo_RViCGstk>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-buraglio-v6ops-ula discussion
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2022 15:18:43 -0000

+1.

1.
DualStack is for a long time in the Enterprise.
ULA priority below IPv4 makes it useless.
People would be looking for a Private IPv4 replacement.
The absence of the replacement would considerably delay IPv6 adoption in the Enterprise.

2.
Not many expect such ULA priority. People are massively misleaded.

Eduard
From: v6ops [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ed Horley
Sent: Monday, August 1, 2022 6:02 PM
To: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-buraglio-v6ops-ula discussion

I support adoption of the draft

On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 08:01 Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com<mailto:fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>> wrote:
At IETF 114, Nick discussed draft-buraglio-v6ops-ula, which is ongoing in another thread. He asked for the WG to adopt the draft; should we?
_______________________________________________
v6ops mailing list
v6ops@ietf.org<mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
--
ed@hexabuild.io<mailto:ed@hexabuild.io> - 925-876-6604

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email