IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-buraglio-v6ops-ula discussion

Markus de Brün <markus@mxdomain.de> Tue, 02 August 2022 07:45 UTC

Return-Path: <markus@mxdomain.de>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52544C157B39 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 00:45:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mxdomain.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DCEYHDrJzlcb for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 00:45:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.yourmailgateway.de (relay.yourmailgateway.de [188.68.61.102]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B1CDC157B32 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 00:45:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mors-relay-8403.netcup.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mors-relay-8403.netcup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Lxn9B2pTtz802L for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 09:45:50 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mxdomain.de; s=key2; t=1659426350; bh=qlYNgmD7gx0w/yi4gLE6/poDWJwOIg1GTe4cR7/x0j8=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=Ulpn/NfLOpytkmvp5TPpuNNAmGCgCndJvh41ikbaiqqRUo3/6rPcg0iTvXQap5/fA w3UgTVLvHJcMiMuIV2uePzz/6rzw4Af2YVEVdWQHVXLSeOWVygBV1BGSFDUmHVcx01 RuQk4jAygwg8JlsQBQ4i2bptWzLR9IHMSBuYfCPtjuhlJ7GLzg+LAO1yHQ6UJbfOj9 5xYjOud4+9F+LBYyXwUmHTHkZdr07beJcOjRdI8auSPzJLLJOUQUgbREeKtPw9xEE/ MzDcVncyYkf+tU5FTGBgQUA+P9bAncpr04zbwAG4sjBLk26EqGdUafQbcYDauNjG2z RBxQmg7gjioow==
Received: from policy02-mors.netcup.net (unknown [46.38.225.53]) by mors-relay-8403.netcup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Lxn9B2RFjz8026 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 09:45:50 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at policy02-mors.netcup.net
Received: from mx2f50.netcup.net (unknown [10.243.12.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by policy02-mors.netcup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Lxn9941Vnz8sb3 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 09:45:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.0.82] (ip-088-152-186-056.um26.pools.vodafone-ip.de [88.152.186.56]) by mx2f50.netcup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8D8C910081E for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 09:45:48 +0200 (CEST)
Authentication-Results: mx2f50; spf=pass (sender IP is 88.152.186.56) smtp.mailfrom=markus@mxdomain.de smtp.helo=[192.168.0.82]
Received-SPF: pass (mx2f50: connection is authenticated)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------vImyr1r0AO0jLfp0SegKFiaQ"
Message-ID: <9587f04b-6864-4c84-bf80-a5643c7a198c@mxdomain.de>
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2022 09:45:48 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.1.0
To: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <CABKBHweedb9Cmefy3M+jBkX3P_ML++a2N7SpSKVcZ0gL2U5K8w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Markus de Brün <markus@mxdomain.de>
In-Reply-To: <CABKBHweedb9Cmefy3M+jBkX3P_ML++a2N7SpSKVcZ0gL2U5K8w@mail.gmail.com>
X-PPP-Message-ID: <165942634887.24548.1172723520739958319@mx2f50.netcup.net>
X-PPP-Vhost: mxdomain.de
X-NC-CID: HrSTZQ04/Dip7RLgM/tr+IzoonRkLj7cPeBa5YzGQSA=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/aTdMurnGnlRtn-t6QbTY-db6Ftc>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-buraglio-v6ops-ula discussion
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2022 07:45:59 -0000

Yes, please. I support adoption of this draft.


On 01.08.22 17:00, Fred Baker wrote:
> At IETF 114, Nick discussed draft-buraglio-v6ops-ula, which is ongoing 
> in another thread. He asked for the WG to adopt the draft; should we?
>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email