IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-buraglio-v6ops-ula discussion

Nick Buraglio <buraglio@es.net> Mon, 01 August 2022 17:43 UTC

Return-Path: <buraglio@es.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AEDDC14F723 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2022 10:43:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.093
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.093 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=es.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r6j-aEa3QYr1 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2022 10:43:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42c.google.com (mail-pf1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23ADDC15C513 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Aug 2022 10:43:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id d20so3853333pfq.5 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 01 Aug 2022 10:43:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=es.net; s=esnet-google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=zlXfzZrtMWepLnWtKut6zKXffdFwGK66hC/P20+/Qho=; b=BP+2MUx7zz5IbeY9EMAWo1avtVbFr7zWmwDulMmWmFNEwlkj/NaY91WM3rGsdIPkkN +OV33yP0IxqRWbGtV8rChm6N22xRZH+UOdMLnmEoDtdulfg+yQnmXooWiAjMTv1rhqly oexc8ptCnvMjHoEu/SXT8yIhh/EPdDN88soo3XlmuIafukw20+MhFCcbAxmXEueE1n8X sCUGc/LIIqAnYSGHGRyYqfm5A9v6G50iyjVK8dG3+Krxzt+LhRbmh854SCWmSr1rodo+ 4DgYUAOCAoCHGAlXlDIR/3NYbEtDisQuUrB+8BXQcrHOnNY2B2uvj2r8Wo1qhr7PKO+m yjlw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=zlXfzZrtMWepLnWtKut6zKXffdFwGK66hC/P20+/Qho=; b=Pe3Vm37aAyhwb2NkzOVG2gMw//RmwyIAe30MI4JMOUqR+AOds220labAyslEafXUub XwzDtvSE7zZlu2ugy2VhecVq+prvLe18ULTX8Alhz83w+pSLME4Nf2q0EO1E34Vg+D69 Wltl73saLA3BvHxMRNiuca26tqZ6yTysofBt7AA4NJP6rtmsLXAT5ze4Fvc9CJMuZ0tO SIeunExKZ3WjptjrUls8MLv6YAd8I+WbW2nPuK+3yzNqOnE0upFiAvSF/rbFHuW/xsQm LE/D8DLrEAvJTMQwG4vYsJlrmdQun+Ae8naU4BlV6FIw6bC2VFFaFTk2Sezt5sWvnW9Y ST5A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo1yM9IJ5dlCn/jYB72FGJ223Q4i6GS0Lu/xQ3KvD8RXM1hU50yJ u+D33Ji+foz3XqsYpcC2GovyEUs+ITDSmmnB//yxhj1hQVM9radKQTdm4EBl16A597k7SznXW7o FidOoHUA9YLxkp9PxHJx+TS78qp/rRaNPBpb58C1c3uf8z8rv1mEURkl1extZgobnNLzXgsKotX x3SuTj
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR7ueqC5ECM5KuW59Flfqq/QG1qxgWjCul/6B9NkgHBw5dLmxwjj+M7X4rVU5l8YByaqa0mjZSTACW6gnra5TC4=
X-Received: by 2002:a65:6d97:0:b0:41c:1e06:3ba4 with SMTP id bc23-20020a656d97000000b0041c1e063ba4mr4587359pgb.282.1659375828903; Mon, 01 Aug 2022 10:43:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABKBHweedb9Cmefy3M+jBkX3P_ML++a2N7SpSKVcZ0gL2U5K8w@mail.gmail.com> <CAN-Dau2L6-4cjc-KFKCifBau2Lcu8KuyL+9-oYmNk_rGVVGk1A@mail.gmail.com> <CAE=N4xdQMm2jhyzqRHLm0r5BUsiQCh=5=yKWxZzzSvpR4QWLeQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAE=N4xdQMm2jhyzqRHLm0r5BUsiQCh=5=yKWxZzzSvpR4QWLeQ@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: buraglio@es.net
From: Nick Buraglio <buraglio@es.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2022 12:43:37 -0500
Message-ID: <CAM5+tA8p8vpP1E3NL0+eBhEWZ=uD_kik8Mdu=dBN9gQjSKeHAA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ed Horley <ed@hexabuild.io>
Cc: David Farmer <farmer=40umn.edu@dmarc.ietf.org>, v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d5269505e5318a7c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/k02uvc5CGoix0vqszIknCQiB3Qs>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-buraglio-v6ops-ula discussion
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2022 17:43:54 -0000

Agreed on 6724. I've been kicking around some text to address the
inconsistencies in 6724, happy to take that further, if that belongs in
6man I can work with whomever there, assuming work isn't already being
done.


nb


ᐧ

On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 12:35 PM Ed Horley <ed@hexabuild.io> wrote:

> I agree the fix belongs in 6man - perhaps just 6724bis? There are a few
> other ideas to address the problem too, would those stay in v6ops or move
> to 6man also?
>
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 10:08 AM David Farmer <farmer=
> 40umn.edu@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
>> I support WG adoption of this draft.
>>
>> Further, I support actually fixing the issue, most likely by making RFC
>> 6724, section 10.6, mandatory, rather than optional as it currently is in
>> RFC 6724. Additionally, I think a mechanism for the network to be able to
>> signal more than one /48 as local, and/or that a shorter ULA prefix should
>> be considered local, say a /44, /40 or even shorter, would be very useful
>> as well. However, I suspect actually fixing the issue belongs in 6man and
>> not v6ops.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 10:00 AM Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> At IETF 114, Nick discussed draft-buraglio-v6ops-ula, which is ongoing
>>> in another thread. He asked for the WG to adopt the draft; should we?
>>>
>>
>> --
>> ===============================================
>> David Farmer               Email:farmer@umn.edu
>> Networking & Telecommunication Services
>> Office of Information Technology
>> University of Minnesota
>> 2218 University Ave SE        Phone: 612-626-0815
>> Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029   Cell: 612-812-9952
>> ===============================================
>> _______________________________________________
>> v6ops mailing list
>> v6ops@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>>
>
>
> --
> Ed Horley
> ed@hexabuild.io | (925) 876-6604
> Advancing Cloud, IoT, and Security with IPv6
> https://hexabuild.io
> And check out the IPv6 Buzz Podcast at
> https://packetpushers.net/series/ipv6-buzz/
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email