IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-buraglio-v6ops-ula discussion

Ivan Pepelnjak <ipepelnjak@gmail.com> Mon, 01 August 2022 19:24 UTC

Return-Path: <ipepelnjak@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCA95C157B39 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2022 12:24:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.103
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.103 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vJuKH6AZLxNy for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2022 12:24:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62f.google.com (mail-ej1-x62f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FCF6C14F72E for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Aug 2022 12:24:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62f.google.com with SMTP id a7so9182288ejp.2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 01 Aug 2022 12:24:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=Y9YFFwCax8UXR1c92fweGumdjMHbieVD6eooPrmvs9A=; b=ql5iuTAERlv/5lSVQj5hvR1qoPZRC7DCXf/FFvkVihIPKPZT/e9/f2ZHLQlMCSIoTP oBFT7RyEc6uipNdroOjeL4J0CXFeDFw46g7UmMGqxCBgU1uvsadc59ny64YYxf+Vi3dt UKy3yVOGNo+tNg3Q6ALaoLbMHqPeVg+hc4vd1oWUnzeJddFsP4Q/Qdmt1qBtqr10zVVf nHrsVIPoshcCnwib5U18Z6nEcZNXRUxHm31muMu4Jn7XaB8Tkfrjs7Z70D2h7/TxBI29 cxQTe8dYaK5TDGJv+w0kktHw0BXGupELIVM4GBgsrhCEmBkVTw/7ub1ZIzsS8rptwZob dyOw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=Y9YFFwCax8UXR1c92fweGumdjMHbieVD6eooPrmvs9A=; b=LtSgvG4Y/70aRK+B+tizyY1J+eMk0F3QoFdAgPxe9bBOAXDO2VCN//bc2FZ4s3lfL6 w4IjuxonIuUxYOQkN4vDNvv/Y8oUWVoVY+cp0ver/y3m4hsBjy6ydhFi9E5PVc/an3tI RRNaugoC86RD6nDCOMLEfaEDDhL04tq4QhyUc0jpczLs+3p3jOJJJMvNoUuLllTnGvAI JGLdpDu8UMnZlOAd43vSvbrl+OOBYNY9HpmGTIN727u9skd3DjknSGCfBHvik5lCzqHT oCh4pab1c55RJV19R8WRzMdPNlpB5LqUtraUjLi3/eVBj8yoH3IpSBx3RRJaHLgEia0m u15Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora8WW1Yq5R4Xjeq1D2BogdWhOxZMk8vMM8N38znmhRCVp32cSGqs snRzlFnVzPtmyjArEHz4cn+PvT3vpZpVHg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1tVO3n7eo11KcuzMihgy7+BM9R6mZ8wtALMbno+WR6Db7cOBRtpRkX2iblxpFGjIlgoN3q3ow==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:2cd3:b0:72b:5cc2:bc1f with SMTP id hg19-20020a1709072cd300b0072b5cc2bc1fmr13541603ejc.574.1659381839436; Mon, 01 Aug 2022 12:23:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (212-51-128-4.fiber7.init7.net. [212.51.128.4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g10-20020a1709067c4a00b0072ab06bf296sm5524794ejp.23.2022.08.01.12.23.58 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 01 Aug 2022 12:23:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ivan Pepelnjak <ipepelnjak@gmail.com>
X-Google-Original-From: Ivan Pepelnjak <IPepelnjak@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <3C49EB0F-45A1-41AB-879A-39B415DDA5B2@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C79A31C3-E8F1-40F0-A120-F70E503A3B22"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\))
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2022 21:23:57 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CABKBHweedb9Cmefy3M+jBkX3P_ML++a2N7SpSKVcZ0gL2U5K8w@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
To: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <CABKBHweedb9Cmefy3M+jBkX3P_ML++a2N7SpSKVcZ0gL2U5K8w@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/spkl0c6m_zG_39Uzhcsy4mlTYI4>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-buraglio-v6ops-ula discussion
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2022 19:24:05 -0000

I fully support the adoption of this draft.

> On 1 Aug 2022, at 17:00, Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> At IETF 114, Nick discussed draft-buraglio-v6ops-ula, which is ongoing in another thread. He asked for the WG to adopt the draft; should we?
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email