IETF Logo Mail Archive

[v6ops] Done now... Re: Thoughts on draft-byrne-v6ops-clatip-01

joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Sun, 04 May 2014 12:14 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD85B1A0083 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 May 2014 05:14:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rAmsANc_yV3F for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 May 2014 05:14:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10A591A0117 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 May 2014 05:14:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mb-aye.local (75-148-161-129-Houston.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [75.148.161.129]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s44CEXBw047873 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sun, 4 May 2014 12:14:34 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <53662F25.60609@bogus.com>
Date: Sun, 04 May 2014 07:14:29 -0500
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/29.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
References: <DA7557DA-C003-4FAC-A1C5-2FAD5BD028EC@cisco.com> <CAKD1Yr3JA8jKjfk1BMA4dfMQ8CQ5L5V5txnEmXPLjE=CnOR9VQ@mail.gmail.com> <40C41DA9-3513-4BC3-B6C9-7A1EEF98BBC7@cisco.com> <CAKD1Yr2AZN7+czefosQG9uaJ0dDLmtrAp7+QHKOP+Kpk+rBvcA@mail.gmail.com> <5361DBFA.3010403@bogus.com> <B6D62ADF-63DF-41CE-92F2-361E3120CFB5@delong.com> <1399164466.73074.YahooMailNeo@web162201.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <53659AD2.1070802@gmail.com> <7BA49415-6F21-44F4-B857-5FED23A20352@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <7BA49415-6F21-44F4-B857-5FED23A20352@delong.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GVjaCJR40qKRmvNc3rCf8QLkm7hshRvUM"
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (nagasaki.bogus.com [147.28.0.81]); Sun, 04 May 2014 12:14:35 +0000 (UTC)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/-Bw9tYbPusMTUzfXyj8_bma-_oY
Cc: V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>, "Byrne, Cameron" <Cameron.Byrne@t-mobile.com>
Subject: [v6ops] Done now... Re: Thoughts on draft-byrne-v6ops-clatip-01
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 May 2014 12:14:44 -0000

I Think we can consider this discussion closed.

discussion of the draft is fine.

the ipv6 addressing architecture is not something we need to re-litigate
to discuss it.

Thanks
joel

On 5/4/14, 3:04 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> 
>>
>> Spare me the argument about not needing private addressing at all, because
>> some enterprise network managers simply want it and aren't interested
>> in the counter-arguments.
>>
>>   Brian
> 
> Thank you for proving my case that at least to some extent, determined ignorance is a driving factor for ULA.
> 
> Owen
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email