IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Thoughts on draft-byrne-v6ops-clatip-01

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Wed, 30 April 2014 23:03 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 176DF1A0955 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 16:03:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.028
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.028 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3AQWuVHXR-09 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 16:03:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x22f.google.com (mail-ie0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57CB61A04E8 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 16:03:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f175.google.com with SMTP id rl12so2771580iec.20 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 16:03:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=s8A9VqJd5SM6IDvfwcLcVW2uafquKnFklU5HEP0SH28=; b=edSiXVjFTrSmZtNNnuzyAavA2+c4H9ltrtNNk4jwxlG1QoG8CgM1drR8Iki7HJ7SGV LJcv6RzTrno52IyBpy2EbMfvGdFith9ha7POOPM7R7LOAVvsDBHMmychrjWgg/DgqyAY J3UONL11Io01WQ9O+6bfOwarmSiMSZEXAacX+DZsW8SPLZ7VfHctMLt14N6SUGlFTpbI 1fNWsxQ6MoHCndCEn1rmLUhDD2UreANGpAUXfPk+rb9IO84bD9J/qhDizIj6qcLxoyAP TANEEoj2TqYlwbaWlGCqzvVDWzF4wcCz8ReouSnOikxlGlcLKSzFaYCISwAQvnB9o1X6 M/7A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=s8A9VqJd5SM6IDvfwcLcVW2uafquKnFklU5HEP0SH28=; b=nKFGInOofLMZ8iTsrHAWiAVWt6foQ6YzCk8tdz+xcT4HXsYoGiVQXKT4ozxdTQ4ZZ4 K/Ycj1wSGUGo5MXjDWxXeID/pmKwPL7ztw6J6FF3kpK1FLLBiLel+FJeyhKwbz92d1FL bnq4g+owCwsXKsfWn1AMHR8Rh13AaLsfwGMvRn9Ft4HBJ/XeSvTbh3Kx5blBr8iGfCbf f5Jf6t065ol22DVrISn4oopCegWrI+V+0J7H22q7gyWIgvHzqNli3S7He5g6DQF7i1iC hmhfRpOhAPTWKRYoSBsODoYpC2zMyhRfuiblMQ1m8xJYVFYJCOMueJjqRE5J/WEtzg9z LNEA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmhouFJ77EzcXpm7qAzJJI8OeCTsL86MIwh395IrJZsIiozUhqSw+XalvXxT5OF/1rb2C0N
X-Received: by 10.50.147.9 with SMTP id tg9mr42055192igb.31.1398898637453; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 15:57:17 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.18.136 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 15:56:57 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <DA7557DA-C003-4FAC-A1C5-2FAD5BD028EC@cisco.com>
References: <DA7557DA-C003-4FAC-A1C5-2FAD5BD028EC@cisco.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Thu, 01 May 2014 07:56:57 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr3JA8jKjfk1BMA4dfMQ8CQ5L5V5txnEmXPLjE=CnOR9VQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e013a03ac5ce25304f84a7804"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/iwNapD9v4GiakXlUNnhTZvudi-g
Cc: V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>, "Byrne, Cameron" <Cameron.Byrne@t-mobile.com>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Thoughts on draft-byrne-v6ops-clatip-01
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 23:03:16 -0000

On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 7:48 AM, Fred Baker (fred) <fred@cisco.com> wrote:

> >    To avoid conflicts with any other network that may communicate with
> >    the CLAT, a locally unique address must be assigned.
>
> Dumb question. Is there a reason to not use 169.254.0.0/16?
>

Yes. 169.254.0.0/16 is link-local, which implies no off-link connectivity
and no Internet connectivity. If your only IPv4 address is in that range,
applications might well assume that there is no off-link connectivity.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email