Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-srv-00.txt

[Brian E Carpenter <[e-mail]>]

Wait a minute... the I-D submission tool is supposed to block such filenames and require WG Chair approval - there was definitely a robotic or human glitch here.

I'd like to know if it was robotic glitch, because that could be fixed ;-). If it was a human glitch, never mind.

Regards
   Brian

On 12-Mar-19 04:37, Lee Howard wrote:
> 
> On 3/11/19 5:35 AM, Martin Hunek wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I suppose it hasn't been. I'm actually new in this, so I'm sorry if I caused any confusion. I haven't found any best practice for submission, so I thought it would be the best to make submission first and discuss and make changes afterwards.
> 
> On behalf of myself only, don't worry about it.
> 
> There's a naming convention that is poorly described at https://www.ietf.org/standards/ids/guidelines/  (Section 7).
> 
> When first submitting a draft, name it draft-lastname-wg-topic.
> 
> Once the draft is adopted, the chairs will tell you to name it draft-ietf-wg-topic.
> 
> 
> Comment on the draft:
> 
> If I understand correctly, your idea is for the home gateway (e.g.) to search the DNS Search List for SRV records indicating the presence of a NAT64.  Then it should synthesize the DNS64 record, or if it can't, use the ipv4only.arpa trick in rfc7050.
> 
> I think it would work, but I'm not generally in favor of giving more support to people who won't provide forward compatibility. I'd need to think about it more.
> 
> Lee
> 
> 
>> Best Regards,
>> Martin
>>
>> Dne pondělí 11. března 2019 10:19:51 CET, Jordi Palet Martinez napsal(a):
>>> Confused with this doc. Don’t recall having seen it before and then, when it was accepted as WG item ?
>>>
>>> Note: Not meaning to disregard the document contents here.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Jordi
>>>
>>>> El 11 mar 2019, a las 9:57, [e-mail] escribió:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
>>>> This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Operations WG of the IETF.
>>>>
>>>>        Title           : NAT64/DNS64 detection via SRV Records
>>>>        Author          : Martin Hunek
>>>>    Filename        : draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-srv-00.txt
>>>>    Pages           : 8
>>>>    Date            : 2019-03-11
>>>>
>>>> Abstract:
>>>>   This document specifies the way of discovering the NAT64 pools in
>>>>   use as well as DNS servers providing DNS64 service to the local
>>>>   clients. The discovery is done via SRV records, which also allows
>>>>   asignment of priorities to the NAT64 pools as well as DNS64 servers.
>>>>   It also allows clients to have diferent DNS providers than NAT64
>>>>   provider, while providing a secure way via DNSSEC validation of
>>>>   provided SRV records. This way, it provides DNS64 service even in
>>>>   case where DNS over HTTPS is used.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-srv/
>>>>
>>>> There are also htmlized versions available at:
>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-srv-00
>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-srv-00
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
>>>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>>>
>>>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>>>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> v6ops mailing list
>>>> [e-mail]
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>>> **********************************************
>>> IPv4 is over
>>> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
>>> http://www.theipv6company.com
>>> The IPv6 Company
>>>
>>> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> v6ops mailing list
>>> [e-mail]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> v6ops mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>