IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-srv-00.txt

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 11 March 2019 23:58 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF58C131246 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 16:58:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RmNNEe7YpSJp for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 16:58:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42d.google.com (mail-pf1-x42d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D555F13124C for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 16:58:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id j5so437942pfa.2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 16:58:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=F8evrBnO4nl3eLPzMrkq1km8Pc/2ddnc/lC9C7amu2g=; b=UbE/sIHWYkfrlrZDhJG4fHVXS3Eu77lEfqA2791JtALiHRzGv7WugrJ6HenGN2urPc nawZJC4jS311zQgHbdXsbOR/XgN/ahx9/gy3ThngAY9rRilXz47Kmf+O7IljRmaEc+sY vA/Ja2RCVWmuauS+PIoGrX76SbpHYuzPhXkjni1KWZa2KitYOWcw9Vg7W0rjkyW0Iedu HuM0bEPAXXYTGQmHJ5eItC5FR21nXVINVBFEH5TOUapKbDm1XSTw2B1qBi732uHvmdrs aUD6VYILpAFBbwLfI42ZGOeVMRBysUvTwYHKWAe1Jq6ewgyX/3VtuwOyFx0jkOnUi+3Z b6tg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=F8evrBnO4nl3eLPzMrkq1km8Pc/2ddnc/lC9C7amu2g=; b=G+MhcP0CRSBds9gXi3grBB5K1HLVnYddnbkz+OV+ag9QD5PVuJ66eWI7TGIHyBDMCu YiIWejnDSH1rGcddNvNbe/+ywhBtfAOQ3nY3TVLnZ9OgCLaJYXH1qaMOQM+HcQx4i4D0 YZpz0LwZFj+3jF2TNq2mWFsc1zKJHOIGpvHYPuXX2THptp3fTDEr8mgITkMXbAYc5gsu TWSM2F6XVqypAKIfTNuZLlxcz8cjGVVbrqqDKsD/GptEalB6gBiC5jwcoCHW0zz0s2+P IsAhCtL397cuhWpdI8nxUrSOmJxnsm8jLiPhGcYoN2S5DYmnSbfho/RhZTtvfZY+EB3d WMCA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWbzAxPx6fryrAkrkE7mswfjEdWK1DZFferhJAHFGqY0LfMA+C0 G2I+QAeAsIX8ulNT9hM91EMJ/kahk5w=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzBVRn6ixSCdFlsmQjGDfl1qRdsQC/ME5Q71F/vmQDO9R5jNiip5QclYKyEYrQ9o9uGyJijIg==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:6b03:: with SMTP id g3mr15121447pgc.239.1552348706308; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 16:58:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2620:f:8000:210:21fa:5941:8612:9889? ([2620:f:8000:210:21fa:5941:8612:9889]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i126sm16486222pfb.15.2019.03.11.16.58.24 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 11 Mar 2019 16:58:25 -0700 (PDT)
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <60747B6D-C9CB-4DDA-89D3-7519DCA07AB5@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_27A88996-68BF-4736-80D7-5832986071CC"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.2\))
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 08:58:22 +0900
In-Reply-To: <D2858BBF-D465-4A7C-BAF1-DB71A6241EDD@consulintel.es>
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
To: Jordi Palet Martinez <jordi.palet=40consulintel.es@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <155229467244.16964.2716057971582201801@ietfa.amsl.com> <D2858BBF-D465-4A7C-BAF1-DB71A6241EDD@consulintel.es>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/SYRuT30c2HKmj4Xq7K2ywVAjU6I>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-srv-00.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 23:58:35 -0000


> On Mar 11, 2019, at 6:19 PM, Jordi Palet Martinez <jordi.palet=40consulintel.es@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Confused with this doc. Don’t recall having seen it before and then, when it was accepted as WG item ?

As Martin says, it's a brand new doc, and there's a glitch in the title. It was rejected on initial submission because the date was malformed. I took the executive perspective that, especially since the author is in the Czech Republic, it would be better to have the topic on the table and discuss it than get all quibbly with a new author.

I would invite commentary on the substance of the draft, which has to do with how one determines the prefix one should use in a CLAT, and proposes a solution in an SRV record. If there is working group interest, we can invite Martin to discuss it at IETF 104.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email