IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-srv-00.txt

Martin Huněk <martin.hunek@tul.cz> Tue, 12 March 2019 22:23 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.hunek@tul.cz>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5C721224E8 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 15:23:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.92
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.92 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EUhduIrhJMf7 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 15:23:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bubo.tul.cz (bubo.tul.cz [147.230.16.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 053F71200D7 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 15:23:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at tul.cz
Received: from asclepius.localnet (unknown [IPv6:2001:718:1c01:260:73fc:b828:6ebf:30fa]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bubo.tul.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CD12918050A1C for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 23:23:48 +0100 (CET)
From: Martin Huněk <martin.hunek@tul.cz>
To: v6ops@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 23:23:47 +0100
Message-ID: <1661479.kfQ0g9K5eE@asclepius>
Organization: Technická univerzita v Liberci
In-Reply-To: <60747B6D-C9CB-4DDA-89D3-7519DCA07AB5@gmail.com>
References: <155229467244.16964.2716057971582201801@ietfa.amsl.com> <D2858BBF-D465-4A7C-BAF1-DB71A6241EDD@consulintel.es> <60747B6D-C9CB-4DDA-89D3-7519DCA07AB5@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart103527782.2fpVOsBoDr"; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/CeN1cNg2mh05qPz2BwpvHo7Xkwo>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-srv-00.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 22:23:52 -0000

Dne úterý 12. března 2019 0:58:22 CET, Fred Baker napsal(a):
> > On Mar 11, 2019, at 6:19 PM, Jordi Palet Martinez
> > <jordi.palet=40consulintel.es@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> > 
> > Confused with this doc. Don’t recall having seen it before and then, when
> > it was accepted as WG item ?
> As Martin says, it's a brand new doc, and there's a glitch in the title. It
> was rejected on initial submission because the date was malformed. I took
> the executive perspective that, especially since the author is in the Czech
> Republic, it would be better to have the topic on the table and discuss it
> than get all quibbly with a new author.
> 
> I would invite commentary on the substance of the draft, which has to do
> with how one determines the prefix one should use in a CLAT, and proposes a
> solution in an SRV record. If there is working group interest, we can
> invite Martin to discuss it at IETF 104.

I would be delighted to discuss it with you and WG in person.

Martin

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email