Re: [v6ops] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat-02: (with COMMENT)
Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Wed, 14 October 2015 13:15 UTC
Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF6C01A6F64; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 06:15:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bSW9lkvCDNRP; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 06:15:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x22f.google.com (mail-vk0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5E891A6F45; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 06:15:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vkaw128 with SMTP id w128so29112996vka.0; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 06:15:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=NDCDg9W87X8LeRjKaGHr+UwDn5amFAGLtcAH4uJOaos=; b=RRkchDv3R45TyWMUTwz1my/NmEGPTxhFg199iUH/R56TZzQk7WOuvfF6Sc+Jhc5ohk cE4yjJnLMqMbaNgwR243TEO5zlkUZQEB3ft4gvlQhYsWm6/E6nof3k+mYKRsNUJ+mNki i6GGifM2ExhmfbyUAz7VWBINQap669deffYADsjaWd3ay5TU6dKprq6u5jJ0lLzCfyzQ SqV8i0/6VCx8ED/Itxo9VMvjHP+JiJJCtCuJrJNg1w85mM5C6WqNjRXHZxnMpsa44KZF gIrOd9nHmVZwWM0D7zW9TdU0eRB2j7D4AFkmkUbUdtagk5IvBhpYcQ+PgxdqSqNsVOeP Go4Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.31.170.80 with SMTP id t77mr1651944vke.156.1444828535799; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 06:15:35 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba@gmail.com
Received: by 10.31.54.65 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 06:15:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <56CCDCAC-48E6-4CDE-A0C2-DDC20561ECA7@cisco.com>
References: <20151014042545.32717.95557.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20151014111021.6f79c8da@envy.fud.no> <56CCDCAC-48E6-4CDE-A0C2-DDC20561ECA7@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 09:15:35 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: pi5K7EidIqnvUZSO44_YyFFog0M
Message-ID: <CALaySJLK1=pTMUWEyULRFJiEO4pFbcnDRz+Y7BTETjLA3g2h5w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/31AwxkjMA8M1hzzR7mnQ365xojU>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat.ad@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat.ad@ietf.org>, Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>, "v6ops-chairs@ietf.org" <v6ops-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat.shepherd@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat.shepherd@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat-02: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 13:15:38 -0000
> Dumb question: is that something the RFC Editor could address rather > than having Tore spin the draft? Oh, absolutely, it'd be fine as an RFC Editor note, if there are no other changes to make. I only mentioned it because I don't know that the RFC Editor would have picked it up, as they aren't necessarily aware of what the text is meant to say. Barry >> On Oct 14, 2015, at 3:10 AM, Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no> wrote: >> >> * Barry Leiba >> >>> A small editorial thing in the abstract: >>> >>> This document describes an extension of the Stateless IP/ICMP >>> Translation for IPv6 Internet Data Centre Environments architecture >>> (SIIT-DC), which allows applications, protocols, or nodes that are >>> incompatible with IPv6, and/or Network Address Translation to operate >>> correctly in an SIIT-DC environment. >>> >>> With the comma after "IPv6", it looks like you mean this: >>> >>> which allows >>> 1. applications, protocols, or nodes that are >>> incompatible with IPv6 >>> and/or >>> 2. Network Address Translation >>> to operate correctly in an SIIT-DC environment. >>> >>> ...when what you mean is this: >>> >>> which allows applications, protocols, or nodes that are >>> incompatible with >>> 1. IPv6 >>> and/or >>> 2. Network Address Translation >>> to operate correctly in an SIIT-DC environment. >>> >>> I suggest removing the comma. >> >> Good catch - thank you! >> >> Tore >
- [v6ops] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-… Barry Leiba
- Re: [v6ops] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-i… Tore Anderson
- Re: [v6ops] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-i… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [v6ops] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-i… Barry Leiba
- Re: [v6ops] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-i… Fred Baker (fred)