Re: [v6ops] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat-02: (with COMMENT)
"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Wed, 14 October 2015 13:17 UTC
Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FE6A1A6F3F; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 06:17:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -114.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-114.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lgCXT5a5DGQi; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 06:17:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D3071A6F81; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 06:17:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3099; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1444828628; x=1446038228; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=img5V/t1qNGMkgBwSqkeXTzSN+/VgaiCq9i17zhFEyI=; b=bdLuTQT04KBZJHEg+TTkM82xDqFoFXMEBl6+cdkGeMNvIXnZC4LAUGwn +easH/qLw7Djlb+XXKL/JY449O8t0LTm2uxLfNtc/ODSiyFVhnZ2DsLs1 KNKYJcJgwtPJBeou2ivKQ1SCyA9ejS3KAbAo/RpKtwRbeHwelWyfJPelQ 0=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 833
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BCAwBaVR5W/5RdJa1egyaBQga5EYQhDoFagxOCCn8CgT44FAEBAQEBAQGBCoQmAQEBAwF5BQsCAQgSBi4yFw4CBA4FDogYCMJgAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEYiQaCboUNB4MagRQFlhUBgk2BYYhsnAkBHwFDgkSBPnGFaYEGAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,681,1437436800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="41335808"
Received: from rcdn-core-12.cisco.com ([173.37.93.148]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 14 Oct 2015 13:17:07 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-013.cisco.com (xch-rcd-013.cisco.com [173.37.102.23]) by rcdn-core-12.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t9EDH5YY002806 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 14 Oct 2015 13:17:06 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-013.cisco.com (173.36.7.23) by XCH-RCD-013.cisco.com (173.37.102.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 08:16:51 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-013.cisco.com ([173.36.7.23]) by XCH-ALN-013.cisco.com ([173.36.7.23]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 08:16:51 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat-02: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHRBoKWShSS0kvFpEW8xupDLVHs0w==
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 13:16:51 +0000
Message-ID: <96D1176F-2623-4F4B-B9B8-35DFB1551D9C@cisco.com>
References: <20151014042545.32717.95557.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20151014111021.6f79c8da@envy.fud.no> <56CCDCAC-48E6-4CDE-A0C2-DDC20561ECA7@cisco.com> <CALaySJLK1=pTMUWEyULRFJiEO4pFbcnDRz+Y7BTETjLA3g2h5w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJLK1=pTMUWEyULRFJiEO4pFbcnDRz+Y7BTETjLA3g2h5w@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.192.67]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_A6EF6972-16A9-4470-B677-B1843FE4A8A7"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/CyDMpM0NEqt2aIBEaDRARee7au4>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat.ad@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat.ad@ietf.org>, Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>, "v6ops-chairs@ietf.org" <v6ops-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat.shepherd@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat.shepherd@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat-02: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 13:17:09 -0000
OK. If Tore has other updates to make he can pick this up too. But it seems silly to spin the draft for a comma. > On Oct 14, 2015, at 7:15 AM, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote: > >> Dumb question: is that something the RFC Editor could address rather >> than having Tore spin the draft? > > Oh, absolutely, it'd be fine as an RFC Editor note, if there are no > other changes to make. I only mentioned it because I don't know that > the RFC Editor would have picked it up, as they aren't necessarily > aware of what the text is meant to say. > > Barry > >>> On Oct 14, 2015, at 3:10 AM, Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no> wrote: >>> >>> * Barry Leiba >>> >>>> A small editorial thing in the abstract: >>>> >>>> This document describes an extension of the Stateless IP/ICMP >>>> Translation for IPv6 Internet Data Centre Environments architecture >>>> (SIIT-DC), which allows applications, protocols, or nodes that are >>>> incompatible with IPv6, and/or Network Address Translation to operate >>>> correctly in an SIIT-DC environment. >>>> >>>> With the comma after "IPv6", it looks like you mean this: >>>> >>>> which allows >>>> 1. applications, protocols, or nodes that are >>>> incompatible with IPv6 >>>> and/or >>>> 2. Network Address Translation >>>> to operate correctly in an SIIT-DC environment. >>>> >>>> ...when what you mean is this: >>>> >>>> which allows applications, protocols, or nodes that are >>>> incompatible with >>>> 1. IPv6 >>>> and/or >>>> 2. Network Address Translation >>>> to operate correctly in an SIIT-DC environment. >>>> >>>> I suggest removing the comma. >>> >>> Good catch - thank you! >>> >>> Tore >>
- [v6ops] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-… Barry Leiba
- Re: [v6ops] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-i… Tore Anderson
- Re: [v6ops] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-i… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [v6ops] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-i… Barry Leiba
- Re: [v6ops] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-i… Fred Baker (fred)