Re: [v6ops] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat-02: (with COMMENT)

Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no> Wed, 14 October 2015 09:19 UTC

Return-Path: <tore@fud.no>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4D1C1B2D3A; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 02:19:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id as7NUna9hXKN; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 02:19:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from greed.fud.no (greed.fud.no [IPv6:2a02:c0:1001:100::145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E22AD1A1B5C; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 02:10:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [2a02:fe0:c410:d91::8b1] (port=45567 helo=envy.fud.no) by greed.fud.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <tore@fud.no>) id 1ZmI4j-00073d-He; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 11:10:21 +0200
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 11:10:21 +0200
From: Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Message-ID: <20151014111021.6f79c8da@envy.fud.no>
In-Reply-To: <20151014042545.32717.95557.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20151014042545.32717.95557.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.12.0 (GTK+ 2.24.28; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/o0PS7FAjiy4qHBdSXV_mP3uWZ38>
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org, draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat.ad@ietf.org, fred.baker@cisco.com, v6ops-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat.shepherd@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat-02: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 09:19:21 -0000

* Barry Leiba

> A small editorial thing in the abstract:
> 
>    This document describes an extension of the Stateless IP/ICMP
>    Translation for IPv6 Internet Data Centre Environments architecture
>    (SIIT-DC), which allows applications, protocols, or nodes that are
>    incompatible with IPv6, and/or Network Address Translation to operate
>    correctly in an SIIT-DC environment.
> 
> With the comma after "IPv6", it looks like you mean this:
> 
>    which allows
>    1. applications, protocols, or nodes that are
>       incompatible with IPv6
>    and/or
>    2. Network Address Translation
>    to operate correctly in an SIIT-DC environment.
> 
> ...when what you mean is this:
> 
>    which allows applications, protocols, or nodes that are
>    incompatible with
>    1. IPv6
>    and/or
>    2. Network Address Translation
>    to operate correctly in an SIIT-DC environment.
> 
> I suggest removing the comma.

Good catch - thank you!

Tore