Re: [v6ops] question about draft-jjmb-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Mon, 03 July 2017 21:37 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FF54129AC4 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 14:37:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xrWSpO8U1OLJ for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 14:37:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22e.google.com (mail-qt0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E801128B8F for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 14:37:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id r30so152712180qtc.0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 14:37:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=STZ+46Srxe8D3rpKDLkru5Kl7+DWxSrgnUGGQY3imuQ=; b=dmwHWcs8k4mSUQWXT0CdrjjPfdAH1cqaZbTWKrWnL6PhUUX4ugvO2Z9SIW9ohwfUgr io5lcc2ZqSDsd9ynIB/5sC4b5XC4hARXI/4pN65x2nBsFZar6CEsTFG1T1unh6S8kG8Q CF9/XEoPwyaUZboLE6xIFzvWwf32FEw2bwCpE/jP2XHk3F3CuVhp1b1AKrLxKmjEzWgD wttssX0sZ8dcKR3s8rV9l9y7liCDNMmeFlRn9GNmcTc3yajdBj4UYu+KdOelN9QNkDd8 X7Uj8ecpxzfPTKCiNw2IjXroqqPWezDgg0Wj6nyIXnfVjGQya3n5di3lwcEkzi+b0DLI OuTQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=STZ+46Srxe8D3rpKDLkru5Kl7+DWxSrgnUGGQY3imuQ=; b=eyyh5rS5EmvF2/JTwoSphr7pjyWq9pXQ8asX9hr+CQadmukcOOiz/6gXz5T3GzXPmG ZeO1OqVTE6/cs64vexJS8GmFxcvJ6PyZ68UPBkF53o8XGdkWCKXyYZy29ejD+jE4wZGv Ze4hcRbxJhwn8DPIRtpI+d4XYM2SEbUHEmxhEPQF6a3r3iqez6v6U6zkxc7C1lXxpJws bIrnTq25unGbuhkeO48I8dMRy+pWnjhhj1iEK7F36FtLorj8nQTY73K1cqxK8myX66YG 8nuI38W6t6uNdFur8YyMW7rHEjtiv1PpCjxGEXnOF0fx09QsSUPktosgR91WKKoZ4g3s HPxA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOyXU6ERdWrEb+xTBGIAANvuBazkH620lWPpWDdtsxl6Oo6B/8PV /BWwjL2WjUSxXkvmHzxeXg==
X-Received: by 10.200.36.70 with SMTP id d6mr37840588qtd.42.1499117870388; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 14:37:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from macbook-pro-6.ether.lede.home (c-73-167-64-188.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [73.167.64.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t11sm14308762qtt.47.2017.07.03.14.37.49 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 03 Jul 2017 14:37:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <C62AC675-F128-45A5-8F72-A54144AD7C09@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E91F4640-0572-4ABA-ADA2-A188C9B8B258"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 17:37:48 -0400
In-Reply-To: <F8DA8CE5-7D8A-4513-8F1B-601AB96141D6@employees.org>
Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, v6ops@ietf.org
To: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
References: <5348A2C7-D762-470B-9BC9-86B8A09E6369@consulintel.es> <CAKD1Yr1UNvfrozET0Ay4LCtZe-NSBAGwbCcpye7JhGtpzyT2Sg@mail.gmail.com> <645EA227-F9E8-4B15-878B-83BC8FD9809A@employees.org> <DCB3CF45-C552-4A37-B7A2-E90C080170BD@fugue.com> <07EE34C2-A479-41EB-B983-D8F2D585E306@employees.org> <071E625C-7B68-4E9F-98C6-262A1052CBF1@fugue.com> <310527F9-C27E-4EA0-B655-9B20878DC459@employees.org> <3cc51f51-139d-940d-bf05-6e449528f8b1@gmail.com> <F8DA8CE5-7D8A-4513-8F1B-601AB96141D6@employees.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/3NtMcZDBECU9lBkddwxKuLFjWzM>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] question about draft-jjmb-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 21:37:53 -0000

On Jul 3, 2017, at 5:14 PM, Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> wrote:
> no change in location of replication point, and the commonly used multicast scopes are of course much smaller.

This breaks service discovery.