Re: [v6ops] question about draft-jjmb-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host

Ross Chandler <ross@eircom.net> Tue, 04 July 2017 17:12 UTC

Return-Path: <ross@eircom.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77570126CD8 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 10:12:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.42
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.42 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lOHinki_Er5Y for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 10:12:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta03.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net (mta03.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net [159.134.118.145]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C2FEF132461 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 10:11:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 44176 messnum 4592362 invoked from network[213.94.190.11/avas00.vendorsvc.cra.dublin.eircom.net]); 4 Jul 2017 17:11:57 -0000
Received: from avas00.vendorsvc.cra.dublin.eircom.net (HELO avas00) (213.94.190.11) by mta03.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net (qp 44176) with SMTP; 4 Jul 2017 17:11:57 -0000
Received: from [192.168.1.4] ([86.40.118.133]) by Cloudmark Gateway with SMTP id SRMjd8icCUNZBSRMjdRlhc; Tue, 04 Jul 2017 18:11:57 +0100
X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=GcZnpUfL c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=GiPPpUk0tzTpajBNWewD7A==:117 a=GiPPpUk0tzTpajBNWewD7A==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=XgkYmhZldMK02zkb5kIA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.0 \(3436.2\))
From: Ross Chandler <ross@eircom.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAEqgTWb68B5qH6rK8aZSDWXf3ko8rwVpLFsSQ4Foq+gAvQHOJA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2017 18:09:47 +0100
Cc: Jordi Palet Martinez <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8F04571D-77E4-42FC-A958-AC68C2B6953E@eircom.net>
References: <5348A2C7-D762-470B-9BC9-86B8A09E6369@consulintel.es> <CAEqgTWb68B5qH6rK8aZSDWXf3ko8rwVpLFsSQ4Foq+gAvQHOJA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Noah <noah@neo.co.tz>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3436.2)
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfGcNESI1p9qjQXCa6VX5HOsb/eq+6tdLwekQm5eFw+o7wCD6HDSLYrrVJDSQK18KjS0sgEnSc+kA7FCfwShqfMUEXa9SvNXHnipruKS3lqVWVSwE/uF5 DpKRB+fptegzPz9ZNgrY+HQWeUBKhw5MTiApq4wY1AGD+GIasp13D1OXUtzde5qQVX4wF2h0TAdgorf5Io8zOGomeL2AYttO/wQCVmI1HkBVPHYvyBqR8mOj
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/5zczMx7Fa3gAGw9ZBc6-aBV6ARU>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] question about draft-jjmb-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2017 17:12:02 -0000


> On 4 Jul 2017, at 16:42, Noah <noah@neo.co.tz> wrote:
> 
> 
> How about  “Unique IPv6 Prefix Per /End System",   Since a host could have different interfaces each with a unique Identifier address.

Sticking with the current per-host title is more understandable. I don’t think the draft seeks to preclude more than one unique prefix per end system anyway. 
E.g.  the host may have  multiple network interface types such as WiFi & 3GPP, each connecting to different upstream networks.  

Ross