IETF Logo Mail Archive

[v6ops] question about draft-jjmb-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> Sun, 02 July 2017 19:38 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=13567b6fc3=jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55C5D124E15 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Jul 2017 12:38:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=consulintel.es; domainkeys=pass (1024-bit key) header.from=jordi.palet@consulintel.es header.d=consulintel.es
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14UDSLR6TgC0 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Jul 2017 12:38:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.consulintel.es (mail.consulintel.es [217.126.185.215]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DBE81200C1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Jul 2017 12:38:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=consulintel.es; s=MDaemon; t=1499024311; x=1499629111; q=dns/txt; h=DomainKey-Signature: Received:User-Agent:Date:Subject:From:To:Message-ID:Thread-Topic: Mime-version:Content-type:Content-transfer-encoding:Reply-To; bh=fPcIS40lz9Mm9DrDgT7xPMrnnKHCf/XQ0+os8jgeaV4=; b=ONgoHwIaHWiPv R8KD/hV/84gef5HcWDQagI6b2GN4Oq+8SYG+Q7djGckwkSYG0OGj+DKWJeN+SL88 zGIOfxFW1E8Gt/Cc2H2/Dtif8GAiK0R7B7XtYQE054NNqT8Ru4Y+Ov82rj86rqzy VzfSBwKDnH1ChverhNJDszZnfW4UU8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=MDaemon; d=consulintel.es; c=simple; q=dns; h=from:message-id; b=pCECcenJ1aNg/rGcVQIJ8sRuEz2imHIPNOIhkNE+9U51stmp1fJ4oLeZKwWm Bf2dGLvyLnLUOhiOo0RefsNOuYqOn8fJjl2fW2a8EyUXkEkfjcdfbsPSS 6fBQpvSNQoAHmLPrkQJUhmeziWgX06MtD5S08hG2rak4npY0eb/zYw=;
X-MDAV-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Sun, 02 Jul 2017 21:38:31 +0200
X-Spam-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Sun, 02 Jul 2017 21:38:30 +0200
Received: from [10.10.10.99] by mail.consulintel.es (MDaemon PRO v11.0.3) with ESMTP id md50005463711.msg for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 02 Jul 2017 21:38:29 +0200
X-MDOP-RefID: re=0.000,fgs=0 (_st=1 _vt=0 _iwf=0)
X-Authenticated-Sender: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-HashCash: 1:20:170702:md50005463711::Ngwiyb6b3E9wdzIx:00000no+
X-Return-Path: prvs=13567b6fc3=jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Envelope-From: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: v6ops@ietf.org
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.21.0.170409
Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2017 21:38:28 +0200
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
To: v6ops@ietf.org
Message-ID: <5348A2C7-D762-470B-9BC9-86B8A09E6369@consulintel.es>
Thread-Topic: question about draft-jjmb-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Reply-To: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/NnzrJvKI51mFfV3bqpoKcwcErXc>
Subject: [v6ops] question about draft-jjmb-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2017 19:38:35 -0000

Hi John, Gunter,

While writing an article where I’ve included a reference to this work, I realized something that despite having read many times this document, I didn’t cached before.

The title of the document is “Unique IPv6 Prefix Per Host” but actually I think the overall idea of this work is more on the direction of “Unique IPv6 Prefix Per Link”.

I mean the document is talking always about “link”, whereas sometimes uses “host”, but I believe the intend is more on “host-links”, as everything is applicable to each link in case a host has several. Right? Or I’m missing anything?

I may require a very quick tidy-up of all the document (and I’m happy to review it or help, if you need that) to make sure that everything is consistent if you decide to change the title and make all the text coherent with that.

Regards,
Jordi
 



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email