IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] question about draft-jjmb-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Mon, 03 July 2017 13:16 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2303B131624 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 06:16:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IIoFYaDWtBXw for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 06:16:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x232.google.com (mail-qk0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 122F51300CE for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 06:16:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x232.google.com with SMTP id v143so61324708qkb.0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 06:16:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=5BswuptWewy6Zb9VyzUB8oKoxhVGBx1TvtVa1mMzcNg=; b=0qC3e4dt9cHM8nUDaFjMWZb5s4coSP2HUnmGNlO6nHMlP1UuhwOSPx65nhP1XuAnC6 NjNgpNyS92RA9CBXSqUMlJYcshEGwh7fcqQGTfKCOGZByJKBMLxgMya6hq2bJkr2f9w+ lJc2CHrwwQmUZdwF/7Uhfz5Nt0WwlemkV+znVl1w1MvNYn3glkJxr+mHzBzmFaP47ubK qkJ3pH9bgwDN3250C4sPSWCe/yas9N+dNmoZuHJq+aKlASSUcmf/Hnfka5XjFnJzfzZ2 5ExN4yNOMx1osidkcBiBJlxxA5GXVanXAWKa1j+3QiUj8cHbi9+2vZ8Bxn9k1kpr8ip7 OHAg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=5BswuptWewy6Zb9VyzUB8oKoxhVGBx1TvtVa1mMzcNg=; b=Sk5PPmnku1+UqU6Z+o/uNhSCdtVjI0Eg7tDZotoiGpKVPZjwa4TlYmn33q5uLVrS/O domMU1sA1l+AeB0nDamzvwCe6Z7Nxvti2zGIlHpz6A0OlvNWaaevb0rjIaFdQ8B0Yvdq /OSjBc9Ue8rKjYr2svK/u93B9MD36znoKS91opynQc4qvgzwrPDWi7tlVxUUDG/B9RMN fOLrhmEetzEWgbLYPyTH0xum2lbAPaCzyoJJjQgW3P8Gt9kcKFi+rCeoYpl5igiVQYOw GQlbupyaaOY/UGQGap70NHXI45hwHi7wJUAXXqkcT+9xnjyPEUn8PpzXcSBKQQeCQEly evCQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOwOgbiZKGEIbvwhh20TnMK1OZxbi27r8YHWAzgrcmBC72rz/Zi8 DM/3J7hweUX3YZ7Z
X-Received: by 10.55.104.195 with SMTP id d186mr38708519qkc.176.1499087779142; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 06:16:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.30.153] (c-73-167-64-188.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [73.167.64.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j7sm4687747qtb.60.2017.07.03.06.16.18 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 03 Jul 2017 06:16:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <071E625C-7B68-4E9F-98C6-262A1052CBF1@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_2CCF4CD7-C5FE-4E5B-B678-28722FE30657"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 09:16:16 -0400
In-Reply-To: <07EE34C2-A479-41EB-B983-D8F2D585E306@employees.org>
Cc: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>, "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
To: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
References: <5348A2C7-D762-470B-9BC9-86B8A09E6369@consulintel.es> <CAKD1Yr1UNvfrozET0Ay4LCtZe-NSBAGwbCcpye7JhGtpzyT2Sg@mail.gmail.com> <645EA227-F9E8-4B15-878B-83BC8FD9809A@employees.org> <DCB3CF45-C552-4A37-B7A2-E90C080170BD@fugue.com> <07EE34C2-A479-41EB-B983-D8F2D585E306@employees.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/hJjzn3PrzUBhQPFhDR4FmHHz1ac>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] question about draft-jjmb-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 13:16:30 -0000

On Jul 3, 2017, at 9:07 AM, Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> wrote:
> something that looks like a point to point interface on the router side.

So hosts on the link communicate through the router.   The reason I ask is that while this is certainly a valid way of doing it, it isn't clear to me that it's necessary.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email