IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] question about draft-jjmb-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host

Noah <noah@neo.co.tz> Tue, 04 July 2017 15:42 UTC

Return-Path: <noah@neo.co.tz>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EF67131967 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 08:42:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=neo-co-tz.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WebIDOMNMCvN for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 08:42:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22f.google.com (mail-wm0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DD58131964 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 08:42:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id w126so199427696wme.0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Jul 2017 08:42:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=neo-co-tz.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=uB7KIuPWHxjGpT0x58X4brPqAQodO7jtmbJz6kVjPoQ=; b=SZMKbTaiXbL4UPyduWrxfNRzWukIbTZmnFcp8+t9aqXFCa8tBHprfQQMXa1Pgw0Gwo cTfx0zDcyxScHZQTp6g1cPssVk7IZP0WNHU6hEqst8RAHhhkj84kB0fX4aWPZ24t5bpM UqJF0wLcbVsd12IeFEeh7HMbQ3o+RtfXJ5ql/n9hicM1JnKf4hbUCBaR0uaeOiop1Viv 8Si7PdJIyhKXcUCibXM0X21jnYe3NwbpvfV0xBrfOImLGn1fhAhHXxbjahncsWdNSHgl r96KToq8J5UGYmVcZwjackDEREhBWQ5xK/E9J2e+Kj+CAMLu5ETEKcaI19b8LgOLy02h vYNg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=uB7KIuPWHxjGpT0x58X4brPqAQodO7jtmbJz6kVjPoQ=; b=En1n4J5KdxAjkQfjn6hbQBxG9JdAo07149QLb5fx6ZVjt96hY0Qbzr+bnobfxE6bA0 wJe1MWNTm5cI1snKt3LQ5Pm36MQbrYlxU8NFPodRgPFwGhslo19YVruYB942e6KrRNO+ qt43aXB1ySoEEDiX7zoP+e7I81V4ChrGB3DybBaL7zqLcTEQvW3B6+8PWG+Y+rkzjDT5 pmsXKBgEugcy3hsoEK/z/TSKqXkTH7Qf07BQf0PHK21FTRcaVLJCNXpAM/C0KfuPZUSF Zt0/08Rc/I/FjXsqr+71myaDIvpjNXXy4PCpXiDfm+cFhC1M4FvXiE05zcnqtkj6dbfV Zr8A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOwatPzhkFwZ0CeaejFEzQBscAFxbkr4qXt/NYmNYAvRJisvPgh5 FiubBPwQAywMKfwKEpjMnE2CcyYb0q6s
X-Received: by 10.28.212.145 with SMTP id l139mr24258616wmg.110.1499182961661; Tue, 04 Jul 2017 08:42:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.206.4 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 08:42:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [196.41.63.138]
In-Reply-To: <5348A2C7-D762-470B-9BC9-86B8A09E6369@consulintel.es>
References: <5348A2C7-D762-470B-9BC9-86B8A09E6369@consulintel.es>
From: Noah <noah@neo.co.tz>
Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2017 18:42:40 +0300
Message-ID: <CAEqgTWb68B5qH6rK8aZSDWXf3ko8rwVpLFsSQ4Foq+gAvQHOJA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jordi Palet Martinez <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11469e72e265bc05537fbb1b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/KNJkp7H-1UK-tNQkuMw2y-i8Zic>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] question about draft-jjmb-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2017 15:42:45 -0000

On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 10:38 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <
jordi.palet@consulintel.es> wrote:

> Hi John, Gunter,
>
> The title of the document is “Unique IPv6 Prefix Per Host” but actually I
> think the overall idea of this work is more on the direction of “Unique
> IPv6 Prefix Per Link”.
>
>
How about  "Unique IPv6 Prefix Per /End System",   Since a host could have
different interfaces each with a unique Identifier address.

Cheers,
Noah

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email