IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] sense of draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment

Giuseppe Fioccola <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com> Tue, 30 March 2021 07:45 UTC

Return-Path: <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBC1E3A2A20 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 00:45:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.919
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.919 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aelfdE2NxUVp for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 00:45:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18C013A2A1F for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 00:45:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fraeml707-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.201]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4F8h7v4Mp5z685GQ; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 15:35:55 +0800 (CST)
Received: from fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) by fraeml707-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2106.2; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 09:45:00 +0200
Received: from fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.206.15.33]) by fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.206.15.33]) with mapi id 15.01.2106.013; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 09:45:00 +0200
From: Giuseppe Fioccola <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] sense of draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment
Thread-Index: AQHXJLtlOps7w7BDike/Q0TO7L7m/qqcJGkA
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 07:44:59 +0000
Message-ID: <7837404c0ba34ef38567a1d74df6381c@huawei.com>
References: <6fe89c92-a7f1-baf2-6225-7c1bc397c8ee@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <6fe89c92-a7f1-baf2-6225-7c1bc397c8ee@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.48.211.187]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/3rvcDjjGBn9BKS7OkoiBgzUxwNo>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] sense of draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 07:45:08 -0000

Hi Alexandre,
Yes, the main scope is to describe the global IPv6 deployment and provide an overview on how the transition to IPv6 is progressing, indeed the draft is informational. Anyway, according to the statistics and to the surveys, it can be possible to make some general considerations and report transition challenges in order to encourage actions in the areas identified (e.g. section "Call for action").

Giuseppe

-----Original Message-----
From: v6ops [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alexandre Petrescu
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2021 6:48 PM
To: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: [v6ops] sense of draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment

I wanted to ask whether the sense of the intention of draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment is:

- to describe deployment?

- or to give advice about what the deployment should be?

For my part, I think it should solely describe deployment.

Alex

_______________________________________________
v6ops mailing list
v6ops@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email