Re: [v6ops] Operational Implications of IPv6 Packets with Extension Headers - implications from new development for EHs

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Wed, 29 July 2020 08:44 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@space.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFFFF3A10E1 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 01:44:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=space.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0Hizbrjimsn0 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 01:44:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gatekeeper1-relay.space.net (gatekeeper1-relay.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:3:85::38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2F463A10DB for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 01:44:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=space.net; i=@space.net; q=dns/txt; s=esa; t=1596012249; x=1627548249; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=XP8w18xSfRCAY1ivansL5mq7Z1krU8k75d0glBGtPxI=; b=X4JA+4/AaaRk0+B4O3wi8r1zllPtK6uiONBFHtOzVu3WMKJYENCOEL7Q 4w9oXwJSkWhoHGfVMmPnOjjh/EK+ki5Gdobzibsg71fN0sLsKxsDxyCXO 6RBmD/dOc7OcnD3BphEc1CfsAxUqhA0Sx2VryZjRQjqx6N6UTMhwiR6RT 7o7qV7MiXrjg+ZxJkLC8EEXzl3tzH0vdDg6UsY3bwnjWIw8NWfipKsAJw DgF8t0JecozU1VHL6WxBuPWcBPWAOQngNvX94gJRjnC4Ay8Lhz10wbrQc WRjxn3D7MFUcFwtH7RVeh3TjjGa4wWGai9gl/TqUck7o5AGRMSClWArnP A==;
IronPort-SDR: yDHO1O6GxK9bo044ZVG9OUsubdmRAL/XEY+UmNDI74xL5GoOavAWx7e/11NXYDVukLuIoRq2gr +DlKwdq/zk0t0rDt8vjVtfNU6C7AEu9MQeChKBp40R0bs2+cFiK6vurIydM0AoHdbX5UIZhlEO yzkScN8AFT4m9wS09Ito3rzgv4EGkiVB2zEJwy0PsQ5RM7Ju3avs5ulS7CE0fBQvNYQVeulDrG W3ubh92Uo6elAnKqHvpJcRI1FQVNrOeYr5xCwqGYJ6bvcL+CHidQ6Xqu2U+GB5JRU4RUUPaWW+ f4Y=
X-SpaceNet-SBRS: None
Received: from mobil.space.net ([195.30.115.67]) by gatekeeper1-relay.space.net with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Jul 2020 10:43:51 +0200
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E50BA418BA for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 10:43:51 +0200 (CEST)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius4.space.net (moebius4.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::251]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D68194069F; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 10:43:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by moebius4.space.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id CFCB111C15; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 10:43:51 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 10:43:51 +0200
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard@huawei.com>
Cc: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20200729084351.GG2485@Space.Net>
References: <d8d59ce07f7f4031a545ff6e24fdbb88@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <d8d59ce07f7f4031a545ff6e24fdbb88@huawei.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/4msI5WzgSlx5kxo5LZI1n5Fto1c>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Operational Implications of IPv6 Packets with Extension Headers - implications from new development for EHs
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 08:44:19 -0000

Hi,

On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 08:26:34AM +0000, Vasilenko Eduard wrote:
> I am asking, because may be the question: what to do to mitigate anticipated problem?

Do not assume EHs will work outside a very well-defined scope (SRv6 
is an example of "will work, because won't leave the network where
needed").  If you start work with the goal "must work across the 
wild Internet", abandon the idea to do this with EH.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279