IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] IPv6 link-local and URLs @ IETF119

Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 20 March 2024 05:34 UTC

Return-Path: <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5C91C1D4CEB; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:34:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H582efPlpXFj; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:34:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1030.google.com (mail-pj1-x1030.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1030]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FBE8C1D4A7D; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:34:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1030.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-29fb7e52731so2022127a91.2; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:34:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1710912846; x=1711517646; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=btwYUhdyTrZlm9Oo4OGeobg+TmiJGKiwdjPVQWNW82k=; b=OutW9OhSDwawsZQudFt4VKof/BJreDCEPwnaoQAFPjaELFkttFT3NlMcEToi/3bYDt jsAVQtLSdzQD25bgGtLx59Z/kLWoeomrxIJXPb6p5mfMBQRlxdeBlZqsl/k+HspAoMbY FzKLkz0FiYGgG+2jaz/fYlc8c9n6ITTbIV97gKERBmbEJr4kBZ9Kp1SqtaO5gJhD8tCW tiGT1kfGnE3cyVDiHZFzFz3VvVW4X2hmXbgVRC8bLPVcUclin/qFJxlWN86gtcnoE38v nofVSTNkE7IGwC7SA6yonZ/WyVNBl5uwmhA/PcdpdaRYAIqYKrqjaSoppPrjzmDxYirE k7rw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1710912846; x=1711517646; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=btwYUhdyTrZlm9Oo4OGeobg+TmiJGKiwdjPVQWNW82k=; b=lbBLJuRE+nTXjvBs9yW16sqwN+ZQqqoIfOtNyZgPuXAQ3viY2mM2SH4e9743QJmd56 bfYgP4nT/9XPbptBzs2g9PQ1DG9JGir3MReCwyPywpXz9g4/CgKy0mGjGZq0V/HH1rsN DkjU3SEB2p25NW9qh9juW7/x7757G/5yFtqRSL+qHla4P50mA74G5Cx1IoB7JzDNKkFH wtvNLzGNcsqVoBV4wJKg1UzfVTk9gI4dkmGHEXI1EAX0doUhnDMKQVURHgzG/o+DAT13 NK6Y88b/NbkAlqDWu+kM/z0wlDBDe6hBVQ35Ibzbb7DWU6+P74GRurgcQAwvrZ/ULG6K to8Q==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCW1yCf1Pgtktg3uJ+I900yniW0mhs5UuV4fQX3Odn9/OxV2JvmmT3+h7vV9D24stlMOLcLi8WZ5YbyEzwc8DOUIyuz6x7couJ3XvADLfURADddLiEghmiuMAhdORB7136mTv7k=
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzVdd60kMFLr09j1jpNF2MyZItCVo8bfmgHxricyJQ9ub3tr2QG tx8t8SPlJdQJKaNENwbS/Vv0sRI/XlsELHRrJh3EkTujB69vDMnaN4c8dGRYYirtZX0Qy9XJUxf Cx1btdTcDbae50X9jgaj7CgmgxK4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFYbbkGt99GtlMGuB3NEq7LXx9kAkd1o4VPn6GiosStU8WZE1ha66cni/KUCClcJPDvnB6hpB/r1j791jwIo0o=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:bb04:b0:29b:aea0:1883 with SMTP id u4-20020a17090abb0400b0029baea01883mr3993876pjr.2.1710912846357; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:34:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAL0qLwZ2WELSG868Hcc=dYH_zcm+ecEbavt8Oq7GSTT8st0hWg@mail.gmail.com> <e9387f40-408a-15fb-3f2c-afaa05c5a7ce@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr09GvBdHFqPAujGaJ-j4cLYX2yMLhMDB4b_GfEM-1SNYw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKr6gn3ektAdcMz2g230S3UZKoyMohc_3_t9Xi1QtAcDem3P1Q@mail.gmail.com> <bc63fd8e-4a04-535d-977d-cd102ae0fbae@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr3hQOKYZ0JwOXf6z8d9r4cwggmUXApLWwdgCyNG9XYWVw@mail.gmail.com> <dd8b103c-33ad-962e-f26f-40bc89175a96@gmail.com> <CAMGpriVH2b_V5U9HMg5cz=zGB67qRZh=SZVrEyEWs=mTfbtvJw@mail.gmail.com> <Zfn_q3Q9duxGNXcf@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <394964de-7c3f-135e-6925-8bf7642eb486@gmail.com> <ZfoFtHD5oXVCczZq@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CAL0qLwbSqjA5Kmq3eGwkNrFW_LgUCgeNMgRGwOz2XxBiJ8ycpQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwbSqjA5Kmq3eGwkNrFW_LgUCgeNMgRGwOz2XxBiJ8ycpQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 15:33:54 +1000
Message-ID: <CAMGpriW_38o4_k0pHLQ6hGVruYZyrW+TsCSFY+hno8M9vikC+w@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Cc: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, ipv6@ietf.org, ipv6-chairs@ietf.org, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>, George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org>, "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000072eb67061410f042"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/5OiodEZ76Z_KjLXOVuxtAODbBlI>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] IPv6 link-local and URLs @ IETF119
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 05:34:07 -0000

On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 11:20 AM Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 7:37 AM Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:
>
>> > > Why again is it not in the IESG queue ? Is this not something that
>> 6MAN would have to agree upon,
>> > > aka: stop pursuing the document, stop discussing Murrays DISCUSS ?
>>
>
> It has passed through the IESG queue.  It's still sitting in "IESG
> Evaluation" state because it hasn't been moved to its next step (either
> "Approved, "Dead", or back to the WG for more development), which isn't
> uncommon for documents that need adjustment of some kind before proceeding,
> especially when there exist one or more unresolved DISCUSS positions, or
> when it hasn't enough ballot positions on the record to support approval.
>
> > The IESG is at liberty to return a document to a WG when it has no
>> chance of getting approved in its present form.
>>
>> Ok. Did this happen ?
>
>
> Not as of right now.  It's done at the supporting AD's discretion.
>

We can discuss this at 6MAN tomorrow, but after we do I expect to change
the state of the document in the datatracker (I could do that now, but
figured it could wait until the meeting).

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email