IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-17.txt - C_REC#9 464XLAT

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Mon, 16 February 2015 10:49 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@Space.Net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78B411A87A8 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 02:49:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HoIvqxpN1-PJ for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 02:49:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mobil.space.net (mobil.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:81::67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F08A1A877F for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 02:49:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1E5160134 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 11:49:36 +0100 (CET)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius3.space.net (moebius3.Space.Net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::250]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B06560102 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 11:49:36 +0100 (CET)
Received: (qmail 35279 invoked by uid 1007); 16 Feb 2015 11:49:36 +0100
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 11:49:36 +0100
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20150216104936.GX34798@Space.Net>
References: <20150212124226.3282.9774.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <54DCD464.3000907@gmail.com> <5A769BF0-2A4C-4BA0-88DD-96D94514021D@eircom.net> <54DDEDB8.90001@gmail.com> <D90DE03A-E171-40CD-9C84-4B715229CEC2@eircom.net> <54E0F83F.3020403@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <54E0F83F.3020403@gmail.com>
X-NCC-RegID: de.space
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/7FpYqg-UC2wFgqHhfKiBByq_ZbY>
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-17.txt - C_REC#9 464XLAT
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 10:49:40 -0000

Hi,

On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 08:49:19PM +0100, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
> In the past some of these networks were IPv4IPv6, but now they move to 
> IPv6-only kind of type, and 464xlat/clat is given as reason why.

Care to elaborate?  I do not know of a single case of a 3G/4G network
moving from IPv4IPv6 to IPv6-only.

Some deploy dual-stack, some deploy single-stack, and all for good
reasons - but this is something different than "move to IPv6-only"

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email