IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Tue, 10 September 2013 06:48 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07E4811E8194 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 23:48:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u6EJP8rIffFb for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 23:48:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x22f.google.com (mail-ie0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32A0F11E81C3 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 23:48:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f175.google.com with SMTP id 9so1020208iec.6 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Sep 2013 23:48:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=TYfQ8CdCE983m24RKr1EJ35PUf3M3NDMKq8Tvanhns4=; b=JvZGL1cdmbplxLjdcOY9f5kMdTIloF8M1P8T50/cFCrAATeWEPFXCizZRtTSozaR4w 4Ff3qHPpCPgMSby+8HgmNl8CqCFxqEtwus3cju0wIDgHRG0z8N7cTnAWPfUYvHkZ4dxs vXDqqEbv5FiVwqcJZcGBKqHjCKnB1SllkOutChx531IkdG1vczpiZly9Hw6z61+tDwvF VelSN0H1V2SrmxyHMyrcfbi8yLUtgO96UQcBHWSaatFRLE1xcwX62wanD61RmWa6Wwop iBNP+8nki4f5+D4jgmridASI0myoNvNwF63QpAtf1z+gP6FZiGDvmu5DUp+XPk60LumQ 6RuA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=TYfQ8CdCE983m24RKr1EJ35PUf3M3NDMKq8Tvanhns4=; b=PcNNiRHm03ib9J2GHKJq+CEpKvJ7EEHOU9t9bV2aL9VFCsz1M+DpbP3N+mG4eSxt6P v5KdXW9uI0+kDbUw6taOeiP6i6rn+m4Vg87VhDBbz+qF8gbOmqK7F8rdgeOA8aXAxXFn pwwzMe+sP6ytmPjxiqY43d6GinGSItYFvQdcDy1W5fnCo7B3LUqTwlw4rCb5XObPIqO2 ADgLEE+bK2RU0Ddi8HJ7xh5M1ArBM6ZYQeoLeVe86K4zuq99fh4CRYRB9bZlpApnKlBU GDJXGr1r8U8/NH67x8K4mjHFICsuGZuUS2Yqe5gN85v9FoKAWpix1jzJVsTIsIajHBXL AeEg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk9+BrrN8MilgeP8z7c01C60APz08rtmvov4lk5Xn+YzaYVhmk8lW/dL/qvtS3tHi3/fMSJAO3JDkqDPWauBMuDNhf0sj0Vv1sPkfQ/4/p8dA4q2M0d9KRCX4cTlqbairnFVUIdXwkBxml8cZBIJH9j8bBrGRpAPebnuBZbZN4JnmwgQfqreqY2Oi5zn4LwGS1OZPWw
X-Received: by 10.50.114.168 with SMTP id jh8mr10370947igb.6.1378795731640; Mon, 09 Sep 2013 23:48:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.76.138 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 23:48:31 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36EF06D0AF5@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
References: <20130819135219.8236.40060.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAKD1Yr1VpJne1h-Q5xbNMYRhpr_n0Wmn6UqfeG3vEg2MY6ms1g@mail.gmail.com> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36EF033638D@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <CAKD1Yr0pqeO9KdcKFWVqWP_5pmZ6fgQ5h4tQ=vOO57d-dg5+DA@mail.gmail.com> <10526_1378283356_5226EF5C_10526_843_1_1B2E7539FECD9048B261B791B1B24A7C511C52CE60@PUEXCB1A.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <CAKD1Yr3SddZio-vHGHK=5smb94HP58cY05_TGgWQpkS3=Ay8_w@mail.gmail.com> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36EF033645A@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <CAKD1Yr0CUzSDv9H1eCUpMRUjBDS2OCkfsfE+S+3J8Z-_6=uVSg@mail.gmail.com> <CAKHUCzwYrjyobah-oPWD3vwUeUH5XZ7U=Fqof-f28tneS8jAvQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr0_yOaDjrH-5K696YaziZZR+EMxdRCf=JZBW5LZgWS45Q@mail.gmail.com> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36EF06D0A6F@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <CAKD1Yr3cgJ-xumsMK3eL3zySGsPqXU9uw4L857bJ0VEGcA5mBQ@mail.gmail.com> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36EF06D0AF5@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 15:48:31 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr2WgEi7vg3K9yFgmG64jduZN0kDD5o0m0f1Lfy=dZ28Zw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>" <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e01229f86cd930c04e601e549"
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 06:48:53 -0000

On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 9:16 PM, <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> wrote:

> *
> NEW:*
>
> * *
>
>       NOTE WELL: This document is not a standard, and conformance with****
>
>       it is not required in order to claim conformance with IETF****
>
>       standards for IPv6.  It uses the normative keywords defined in the**
> **
>
>       previous section only for precision.****
>
> * *
>

That's better, thanks. I still think it's important for the document to say
that it's not necessary to do all mountain of work to deploy IPv6, because
otherwise there's the risk that product managers/implementors will say,
"Wait, are you're saying that to deploy IPv6 we have to do all that work?
We can't do all that. Let's focus on something else instead."

How about changing "is not required in order to claim conformance with IETF
standards for IPv6" to "is not required to deploy IPv6 on other networks or
to claim conformance with IETF standards for IPv6"?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email