IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Tue, 10 September 2013 07:23 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4543B21E8128 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 00:23:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GXv3FCLv4VuD for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 00:23:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x235.google.com (mail-ie0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99ECD21E80A6 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 00:23:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f181.google.com with SMTP id y16so10352657ieg.12 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 00:23:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=RvxpKpYDpWFk2Tdk2wBzYsiEuC718YmZ84Rmb4IYV+c=; b=SKfsO8tsZf8MWTKbb5ISN48GRhnKRe7CoHeO9ANh2A3d3f08ece0YY93bmxb90yvhG Ssi4V+46fb86Md2gln1YhQxcXL1/8ne45UyG4ZM/ealewkV4GADYR45ccbhjv/cWbXWY S5xOvuUmHT2rKiMtEnRikUClctqXb2P9v6Lk/oT8O4NfzKXYDR8BEjQ2XQcfC+LkVyAw Limp/za0Y6vA1QDC0NLBRXVi2roAFymq2xZHY2k1axd3RlsEvSA8u8pWoggPbrh6HPeZ tfkDlONGZLIGZ7zlK2wzo/fuR+5cChEc7Gr72f4Va2maNdrgQ0eYjorv4cN7957qh9OX hNyw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=RvxpKpYDpWFk2Tdk2wBzYsiEuC718YmZ84Rmb4IYV+c=; b=Df45y7Jxc/YrRkHndwtNSolrjjobwc7tNrPN3zcljB6tHEcpyCsEEPsph0fwe3Gh6Q lik9HsvCHVRPePmgASmb/+lf0CLG9Dgp1dX7c75JzSuCpRK125aBKD7NQI3/n/oRvxhX s/wweYc8iZAyVMbI6b8OSluUx5svuNKckrTA17NZOMMcuvbyXpIIWd3S0pv7A6R9pfs5 TGfFJF3vZMTulIHHMfYX4PRUaELHpR7TTQV4otyhCJR9ExmZRBduCB4MjCZ1w52hB7Iq dG/3bs0Sa+GB5O3Fcv9iTBwYOj9SCULYHYKB8wtIlG00CsblsDNc/rQ3IXEXrA91JQtq caeA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkR/34tvLkcmd0wv1+oM0a3a7uFs8vDom1gTrcwZO1MvN77++3d76zt7Hw8N7FQZinaq1UZnQeXmOAAET1bmt0zrSVeXMojLOQvqEIrTa7dciHq/A6y951tiEdqrwcstnedDmCHYWKPl6zhZRaqSM+q0kxH9LKEtcY5xsATaDiUxk3m8HDX9JUXyuvOgCZCIi+Not1O
X-Received: by 10.50.1.84 with SMTP id 20mr10454443igk.17.1378797810063; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 00:23:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.76.138 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 00:23:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36EF0EE7D30@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
References: <20130819135219.8236.40060.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAKD1Yr1VpJne1h-Q5xbNMYRhpr_n0Wmn6UqfeG3vEg2MY6ms1g@mail.gmail.com> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36EF033638D@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <CAKD1Yr0pqeO9KdcKFWVqWP_5pmZ6fgQ5h4tQ=vOO57d-dg5+DA@mail.gmail.com> <10526_1378283356_5226EF5C_10526_843_1_1B2E7539FECD9048B261B791B1B24A7C511C52CE60@PUEXCB1A.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <CAKD1Yr3SddZio-vHGHK=5smb94HP58cY05_TGgWQpkS3=Ay8_w@mail.gmail.com> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36EF033645A@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <CAKD1Yr0CUzSDv9H1eCUpMRUjBDS2OCkfsfE+S+3J8Z-_6=uVSg@mail.gmail.com> <CAKHUCzwYrjyobah-oPWD3vwUeUH5XZ7U=Fqof-f28tneS8jAvQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr0_yOaDjrH-5K696YaziZZR+EMxdRCf=JZBW5LZgWS45Q@mail.gmail.com> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36EF06D0A6F@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <CAKD1Yr3cgJ-xumsMK3eL3zySGsPqXU9uw4L857bJ0VEGcA5mBQ@mail.gmail.com> <522EA306.9010103@bogus.com> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36EF0EE7D30@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 16:23:09 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr11PBBRudB1kNn6wuWyGtUPGGiaXaHc=7X383G5M_ri5w@mail.gmail.com>
To: "<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>" <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7bdc188cafc7b404e602616c"
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 07:23:31 -0000

On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 3:27 PM, <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> wrote:

> How can we ensure every implementers will agree with this list? For
> instance we have two detailed technical reviewers


Are reviews still appropriate? I think there are a lot of things left to
say about this document beyond the high-order points we're discussing at
the moment.

If I write them down, will they be considered or will the answer be that
it's too late to accept feedback because the document is already in last
call?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email