IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] [OPSEC] Call for WG adoption - Recommendations on Filtering of IPv6 Packets Containing IPv6 Extension Headers

"C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com> Mon, 13 October 2014 20:47 UTC

Return-Path: <heard@pobox.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66D5F1A008F for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 13:47:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.121
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.121 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ARG6XkiHim0v for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 13:47:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell4.bayarea.net (shell4.bayarea.net [209.128.82.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B341D1A001B for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 13:47:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 18264 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2014 13:47:19 -0700
Received: from shell4.bayarea.net (209.128.82.1) by shell4.bayarea.net with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 13 Oct 2014 13:47:19 -0700
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 13:47:19 -0700
From: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>
X-X-Sender: heard@shell4.bayarea.net
To: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
In-Reply-To: <543C3008.80506@isi.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1410131339030.32206@shell4.bayarea.net>
References: <201410101259128179113@gmail.com> <279945F5-9A00-41AB-903E-FF4F858CB387@employees.org> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1410130907280.14735@uplift.swm.pp.se> <B499E06A-887A-4A9B-8FB9-EE2D3A1F9095@employees.org> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1410130926090.14735@uplift.swm.pp.se> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1410130723530.25821@shell4.bayarea.net> <543C2700.3060404@gmail.com> <543C3008.80506@isi.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/D2ZWjZjf_my7iSvQNOTiJSL1hqw
Cc: opsec <opsec@ietf.org>, v6ops <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] [OPSEC] Call for WG adoption - Recommendations on Filtering of IPv6 Packets Containing IPv6 Extension Headers
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 20:47:28 -0000

On Mon, 13 Oct 2014, Joe Touch wrote:
> On 10/13/2014 12:24 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> ...
> > Exactly. I believe this draft, and the options draft, are *exactly* what
> > the IETF should do (and why we have an E in our name instead of an S;
> > we are not the Internet Standards Task Force). If our standards are
> > unrealistic, we should be the ones to do something about it...
> 
> If it's that our standards are unrealistic, it would be useful to
> address this as changes to the standards.

That's what RFC 7045 does; it has "Updates: 2460, 2780" on its front 
page.  Similarly, draft-gont-6man-ipv6-opt-transmit (the options 
draft referred to above) has "Updates: 2460 (if approved)" in its 
front page.

//cmh

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email