Re: [v6ops] [OPSEC] Call for WG adoption - Recommendations on Filtering of IPv6 Packets Containing IPv6 Extension Headers

joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Tue, 14 October 2014 05:33 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEDB71A6F99; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 22:33:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.769
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.769 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, HOST_MISMATCH_COM=0.311, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YIKYGZ1E1VWa; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 22:33:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from minorthreat.org (ec2-54-68-221-247.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.68.221.247]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F6DF1A6F97; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 22:33:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mb-aye.local (c-67-188-0-113.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.188.0.113]) (authenticated bits=0) by minorthreat.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s9E5XMA8098544 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 14 Oct 2014 05:33:22 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <543CB5B4.9030203@bogus.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 22:33:40 -0700
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:33.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/33.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>
References: <201410101259128179113@gmail.com> <279945F5-9A00-41AB-903E-FF4F858CB387@employees.org> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1410130907280.14735@uplift.swm.pp.se> <B499E06A-887A-4A9B-8FB9-EE2D3A1F9095@employees.org> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1410130926090.14735@uplift.swm.pp.se> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1410130723530.25821@shell4.bayarea.net> <543C2700.3060404@gmail.com> <543C3008.80506@isi.edu>
In-Reply-To: <543C3008.80506@isi.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CJJEbVfmJbLNENIu50sJsWUrsbJ2xakcI"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/zAPCI0zZXLc8tO9lTn8-qt6AYJk
Cc: opsec <opsec@ietf.org>, v6ops <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] [OPSEC] Call for WG adoption - Recommendations on Filtering of IPv6 Packets Containing IPv6 Extension Headers
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 05:33:47 -0000

On 10/13/14 1:03 PM, Joe Touch wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/13/2014 12:24 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> ...
>> Exactly. I believe this draft, and the options draft, are *exactly* what
>> the IETF should do (and why we have an E in our name instead of an S;
>> we are not the Internet Standards Task Force). If our standards are
>> unrealistic, we should be the ones to do something about it...
> 
> If it's that our standards are unrealistic, it would be useful to
> address this as changes to the standards.

It's not entirely unrealistic to expect a consensus about observed
reality to emerge from ops before it evolves into protocol maintenance.

The working groups remit doesn't involve changing standards so frankly
that's right out.

joel

> Joe
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OPSEC mailing list
> OPSEC@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
>