IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] [OPSEC] Call for WG adoption - Recommendations on Filtering of IPv6 Packets Containing IPv6 Extension Headers

Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> Mon, 13 October 2014 06:57 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7A721A88A5; Sun, 12 Oct 2014 23:57:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.235
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lKDlKDwsqVYI; Sun, 12 Oct 2014 23:57:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 204081A88A4; Sun, 12 Oct 2014 23:57:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,708,1406592000"; d="scan'208";a="204593986"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Oct 2014 06:57:30 +0000
Received: from dhcp-10-61-101-249.cisco.com (dhcp-10-61-101-249.cisco.com [10.61.101.249]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9D6vSOh015552 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 13 Oct 2014 06:57:30 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.0 \(1990.1\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
X-Priority: 3
In-Reply-To: <201410101259128179113@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 08:57:38 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <279945F5-9A00-41AB-903E-FF4F858CB387@employees.org>
References: <201410101259128179113@gmail.com>
To: opsec <opsec@ietf.org>, v6ops <v6ops@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1990.1)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/pus6dMo6aD-8y8cIc375zK7kypk
Subject: Re: [v6ops] [OPSEC] Call for WG adoption - Recommendations on Filtering of IPv6 Packets Containing IPv6 Extension Headers
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 06:57:34 -0000

shouldn't this be a draft authored by operators? giving operational recommendations coming out of... well, actual operations?

cheers,
Ole


> On 10 Oct 2014, at 6:59 , Yuchi Chen <chenycmx@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I support the adoption for this draft. IMO, this seems like timely advice concerning the recent data on filtering of packets with extension headers.
> 
> Best regards!
> --------------
> Yuchi Chen
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: OPSEC [mailto:opsec-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)
> Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 6:21 PM
> To: opsec@ietf.org
> Cc: v6ops-chairs@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [OPSEC] Call for WG adoption - Recommendations on Filtering of IPv6 Packets Containing IPv6 Extension Headers
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> Many thanks for your input on this request.
> OPSEC chairs will look at the received input and see together with the v6ops chairs how the IPv6 EH work could progress.
> 
> Kind Regards,
> G/
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve) 
> Sent: 24 September 2014 11:28
> To: opsec@ietf.org
> Subject: Call for WG adoption - Recommendations on Filtering of IPv6 Packets Containing IPv6 Extension Headers
> 
> Dear,
> 
> Please find this request for WG adoption for "Recommendations on Filtering of IPv6 Packets Containing IPv6 Extension Headers"
> The authors of the work explicitly asked for "Call for WG adoption" in its current state. 
> 
> Latest draft can be found at:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering-02 
> 
> (1) Do you support for adopting the draft as OPSEC WG item?
> 
> This call for WG adoption will end 8 October 2014.
> 
> Kind Regards,
> OPSEC chairs
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OPSEC mailing list
> OPSEC@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email