IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] [OPSEC] Call for WG adoption - Recommendations on Filtering of IPv6 Packets Containing IPv6 Extension Headers

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Mon, 13 October 2014 20:57 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75F941A0072; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 13:57:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.986
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.986 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qmLvetGoN83h; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 13:57:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (boreas.isi.edu [128.9.160.161]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DAAB1A000E; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 13:57:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [128.9.160.211] (mul.isi.edu [128.9.160.211]) (authenticated bits=0) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s9DKukUE022063 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 13 Oct 2014 13:56:46 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <543C3C8E.3010405@isi.edu>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 13:56:46 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>
References: <201410101259128179113@gmail.com> <279945F5-9A00-41AB-903E-FF4F858CB387@employees.org> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1410130907280.14735@uplift.swm.pp.se> <B499E06A-887A-4A9B-8FB9-EE2D3A1F9095@employees.org> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1410130926090.14735@uplift.swm.pp.se> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1410130723530.25821@shell4.bayarea.net> <543C2700.3060404@gmail.com> <543C3008.80506@isi.edu> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1410131339030.32206@shell4.bayarea.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1410131339030.32206@shell4.bayarea.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/jh47z48xwLBDq316iCbrHMb4oMs
Cc: opsec <opsec@ietf.org>, v6ops <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] [OPSEC] Call for WG adoption - Recommendations on Filtering of IPv6 Packets Containing IPv6 Extension Headers
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 20:57:30 -0000


On 10/13/2014 1:47 PM, C. M. Heard wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Oct 2014, Joe Touch wrote:
>> On 10/13/2014 12:24 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> ...
>>> Exactly. I believe this draft, and the options draft, are *exactly* what
>>> the IETF should do (and why we have an E in our name instead of an S;
>>> we are not the Internet Standards Task Force). If our standards are
>>> unrealistic, we should be the ones to do something about it...
>>
>> If it's that our standards are unrealistic, it would be useful to
>> address this as changes to the standards.
> 
> That's what RFC 7045 does; it has "Updates: 2460, 2780" on its front 
> page.  Similarly, draft-gont-6man-ipv6-opt-transmit (the options 
> draft referred to above) has "Updates: 2460 (if approved)" in its 
> front page.

Right, but it's not what either this doc
(draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering) or
draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-in-real-world does.

I've raised this issue before.

Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email